Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Manrique v. U.S., No. 15-7250 (U.S. Supreme Court) (581 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1266) (April 19, 2017) (Justice Thomas)

Loaded on April 24, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists April 24, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

When defendants are convicted of Federal crimes, it has become quite common for district courts to enter two different judgments: an initial judgment of the conviction and the incarceratory portion of the sentence, and a subsequent, amended judgment of restitution after a hearing under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act. And, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Lara, No. 15-4767 (4th Cir.) (850 F.3d 686) (March 14, 2017) (Judge Barbara Milano Keenan)
  2. Nelson v. Colorado, No. 15-1256 (U.S. Supreme Court) (581 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1249) (April 19, 2017) (Justice Ginsburg)
  3. Manrique v. U.S., No. 15-7250 (U.S. Supreme Court) (581 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1266) (April 19, 2017) (Justice Thomas)
  4. U.S. v. Swisshelm, No. 16-1416 (8th Cir.) (848 F.3d 1157) (February 22, 2017) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
  5. U.S. v. Lough, No. Crim. No. 1:16CR18 (N.D.W.Va.) (203 F.Supp.3d 747) (August 25, 2016) (Judge Ireme M. Keeley)
  6. U.S. v. Rothbard, No. 16-3996 (7th Cir.) (851 F.3d 699) (March 17, 2017) (Judge Diane P. Wood)

More from these topics: