Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Griffith, No. 13-3061 (D.C. Cir.) (867 F.3d 1265) (August 18, 2017) (Judge Sri Srinivasan)

Loaded on Aug. 28, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists August 28, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Probable Cause.

Here a divided panel held a warrant authorizing officers to search for and seize all cell phones and other electronic devices in defendant's residence was invalid both because it was overly broad and because it was unsupported by probable cause.

In this case, a divided panel from the D.D. Circuit ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Davis, No. 15-10402 (9th Cir.) (854 F.3d 601) (April 14, 2017) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
  2. U.S. v. Martoma, No. 14-3599 (2nd Cir.) (869 F.3d 58) (August 23, 2017) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)
  3. U.S. v. DeRusse, No. 15-3302 (10th Cir.) (859 F.3d 1232) (June 20, 2017) (Judge Monroe G. McKay)
  4. U.S. v. Hillie, No. 16-cr-0030 (KBJ) (D.D.C.) (227 F.Supp.3d 57) (January 5, 2017) (Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson)
  5. U.S. v. Griffith, No. 13-3061 (D.C. Cir.) (867 F.3d 1265) (August 18, 2017) (Judge Sri Srinivasan)

More from these topics: