Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Singh, No. 16-1111-cr (2nd Cir.) (877 F.3d 107) (December 12, 2017) (Judge Denny Chin)

Loaded on Dec. 18, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists December 18, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Substantively Unreasonable.

This is a model Guidelines sentencing decision filled with nuggets of pure gold in which the district judge (Katherine Forrest of the S.D.N.Y.) was sharply rebuked for imposing an above-Guidelines sentence in an illegal reentry case that was three times the top of the Guidelines range - a sentence that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Adams, No. 16-2786 (6th Cir.) (873 F.3d 512) (October 11, 2017) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
  2. U.S. v. Rivera, No. 16-CR-323-002 (E.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.3d ) (December 7, 2017) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  3. U.S. v. Robinson, No. 15-4098 (6th Cir.) (862 F.3d 760) (June 14, 2017) (Judge John M. Rogers)
  4. Bacall v. Stoddard, No. 16-2668 (6th Cir.) (2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 24382) (November 29, 2017) (Judge David W. McKeague)
  5. U.S. v. Poulson, No. 16-1224 (3rd Cir.) (871 F.3d 261) (September 14, 2017) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
  6. U.S. v. Singh, No. 16-1111-cr (2nd Cir.) (877 F.3d 107) (December 12, 2017) (Judge Denny Chin)

More from these topics: