Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Williams, No. 15-10475 (9th Cir.) (842 F.3d 1143) (December 5, 2016) (Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz)

Loaded on Jan. 23, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists January 23, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Booking Questions Exception.

CASE SUMMARY


OVERVIEW: HOLDINGS: [1]-Questions about appellant's gang affiliation were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response, even if the federal RICO charges had not yet been filed, because when the deputy asked appellant about his gang membership, he had already been arrested on charges of murder, conspiracy to commit ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Estate of Miller v. Marberry, No. 15-1497 (7th Cir.) ( F.3d ) (January 30, 2017) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  2. Watson v. U.S., No. 14-CV-6459 (E.D.N.Y.) (179 F.Supp.3d 251) (February 25, 2016) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  3. U.S. v. Williams, No. 15-10475 (9th Cir.) (842 F.3d 1143) (December 5, 2016) (Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz)
  4. U.S. v. Hill, No. 3:16-cr-00009-jag (E.D.Va.) (182 F.Supp.3d 547) (April 22, 2016) (Judge John A. Jr. Gibney)
  5. U.S. v. Patrick, No. 15-2443 (7th Cir.) (842 F.3d 540) (November 23, 2016) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

More from these topics: