Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Honeycutt v. U.S., No. 16-142 (U.S. Supreme Court) (581 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1626) (June 5, 2017) (Justice Sotomayor)

Loaded on June 26, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists June 26, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

Under the Federal drug forfeiture laws, a defendant can be ordered to turn over “any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly,” from the crime. In addition, if assets traceable to the crime cannot be located, the Government can seize anything else a defendant might have to satisfy the forfeiture ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Kokesh v. S.E.C., No. 16-529 (U.S. Supreme Court) (581 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1635) (June 5, 2017) (Justice Sotomayor)
  2. Honeycutt v. U.S., No. 16-142 (U.S. Supreme Court) (581 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1626) (June 5, 2017) (Justice Sotomayor)
  3. Weaver v. Massachusetts, No. 16-240 (U.S. Supreme Court) (582 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1899) (June 22, 2017) (Justice Kennedy)
  4. Lee v. U.S., No. 16-327 (U.S. Supreme Court) (582 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1958) (June 23, 2017) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)
  5. Ziglar v. Abbasi, No. 15-1358 (U.S. Supreme Court) (582 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1843) (June 19, 2017) (Justice Kennedy)
  6. Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 15-1194 (U.S. Supreme Court) (582 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 1730) (June 19, 2017) (Justice Kennedy)
  7. Buck v. Davis, No. 15-8049 (U.S. Supreme Court) (580 U.S. ___; 137 S.Ct. 759) (February 22, 2017) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)

More from these topics: