Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Lambus, No. 15-CR-382 (E.D.N.Y.) (251 F.Supp.3d 470) (May 4, 2017) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

Loaded on May 15, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists May 15, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, GPS Tracking Device.

This is an interesting decision of first impression that examines whether Federal law enforcement authorities stand in the same shoes as state authorities when relying on evidence derived solely as a product of the suspect’s term of state parole. In answering that question, Judge Weinstein wrote:

“The key to the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Lindsey, No. 14-10004 (9th Cir.) (850 F.3d 1009) (February 27, 2017) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)
  2. U.S. v. Bustamante-Conchas, No. 15-2025 (10th Cir.) (850 F.3d 1130) (March 3, 2017) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
  3. U.S. v. Velazquez, No. 14-10311 (9th Cir.) (855 F.3d 1021) (May 1, 2017) (Judge Michelle T. Friedland)
  4. U.S. v. Billups, No. 15-41470 (5th Cir.) (850 F.3d 762) (March 8, 2017) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
  5. U.S. v. Lambus, No. 15-CR-382 (E.D.N.Y.) (251 F.Supp.3d 470) (May 4, 2017) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

More from these topics: