Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Lindsey, No. 14-10004 (9th Cir.) (850 F.3d 1009) (February 27, 2017) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)

Loaded on May 15, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists May 15, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Lender Negligence.

In this mortgage fraud case, the Court held that that lender negligence is not admissible as a defense in a case of criminal mortgage fraud and the defendant was not thereby denied the opportunity to present a complete defense.

In this mortgage fraud case arising out of the financial markets’ ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Lindsey, No. 14-10004 (9th Cir.) (850 F.3d 1009) (February 27, 2017) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)
  2. U.S. v. Bustamante-Conchas, No. 15-2025 (10th Cir.) (850 F.3d 1130) (March 3, 2017) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
  3. U.S. v. Velazquez, No. 14-10311 (9th Cir.) (855 F.3d 1021) (May 1, 2017) (Judge Michelle T. Friedland)
  4. U.S. v. Billups, No. 15-41470 (5th Cir.) (850 F.3d 762) (March 8, 2017) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
  5. U.S. v. Lambus, No. 15-CR-382 (E.D.N.Y.) (251 F.Supp.3d 470) (May 4, 2017) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

More from these topics: