Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Calhoun, No. 16-cr-92 (SRU) (D.Conn.) (236 F.Supp.3d 537) (February 16, 2017) (Judge Stefan R. Underhill)

Loaded on Sept. 25, 2017 published in Punch and Jurists September 25, 2017
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Emergency Aid Doctrine.

Another of the many exceptions to the general rule that warrantless searches are per se unreasonable is the “emergency aid” doctrine, which has been described by the Supreme Court as follows:

“Law enforcement officers may enter a home without a warrant to render emergency assistance to an injured occupant or ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Chamberlain, No. 16-4313 (4th Cir.) (868 F.3d 290) (August 18, 2017) (Judge James A. Jr. Wynn)
  2. U.S. v. Calhoun, No. 16-cr-92 (SRU) (D.Conn.) (236 F.Supp.3d 537) (February 16, 2017) (Judge Stefan R. Underhill)
  3. U.S. v. Doe, No. 17-604 (10th Cir.) (865 F.3d 1295) (August 4, 2017) (Judge Nancy L. Moritz)
  4. U.S. v. Schock, No. 16-2503 (6th Cir.) (862 F.3d 563) (July 10, 2017) (Judge Julia Smith Gibbons)
  5. U.S. v. Lewis, No. 16-3308 (8th Cir.) (864 F.3d 937) (July 27, 2017) (Judge William Duane Benton)

More from these topics: