U.S. v. Evans, No. 16-10310 (9th Cir.) (833 F.3d 1154) (February 28, 2018) (Judge Milan D. Jr. Smith)
This is an interesting decision in which a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit held that the district court had erred in imposing three of the so-called “standard conditions” of supervised release in effect at the time of the Defendant’s sentencing because those conditions were unconstitutionally vague. The majority therefore ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login