U.S. v. Evans, No. 16-10310 (9th Cir.) (833 F.3d 1154) (February 28, 2018) (Judge Milan D. Jr. Smith)
This is an interesting decision in which a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit held that the district court had erred in imposing three of the so-called “standard conditions” of supervised release in effect at the time of the Defendant’s sentencing because those conditions were unconstitutionally vague. The majority therefore …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login