Skip navigation

Hulen, No. 16-30160 (9th Cir.) (879 F.3d 1015) (January 10, 2018) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)

Here the Court held that admissions made by a defendant during his mandatory sex-offender treatment may be used against him to revoke his supervised release because revocation proceedings are not a "criminal case" for purposes of the Fifth Amendment.

This is an interesting decision in which the Ninth Circuit held ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login