Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Wells, No. 14-30146 (9th Cir.) (879 F.3d 900) (January 11, 2018) (Judge Donald E. Walter)

Loaded on Jan. 15, 2018 published in Punch and Jurists January 15, 2018
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Profiling Evidence.

Here the Court held that districy court committed reversible error by allowing the Government to use criminal profile testimony as substantive evidence of guilt without regard to Rules 403, 404(a)(1) and 404(b) of the Fed.R.Evid.

In this case, the Ninth Circuit reversed double first degree murder convictions due to the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Robinson, No. 16-98 (D.D.C.) (255 F.Supp.3d 100) (June 28, 2017) (Judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly)
  2. U.S. v. Wells, No. 14-30146 (9th Cir.) (879 F.3d 900) (January 11, 2018) (Judge Donald E. Walter)
  3. Hulen, No. 16-30160 (9th Cir.) (879 F.3d 1015) (January 10, 2018) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
  4. U.S. v. Zuk, No. 16-4727 (4th Cir.) (874 F.3d 398) (October 24, 2017) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
  5. U.S. v. Tigano, No. 15-3073 (2nd Cir.) (880 F.3d 602) (January 23, 2018) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)

More from these topics: