Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Zuk, No. 16-4727 (4th Cir.) (874 F.3d 398) (October 24, 2017) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)

Loaded on Jan. 15, 2018 published in Punch and Jurists January 15, 2018
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Reciprocal Obligations for the Government.

Here the Court addressed an interesting question about appellate waivers in plea agreements, namely whether the Government should be imlicitely barred from filing an appeal when the defendant has agreed to waive his appellate rights

The Defendant in this case, Julian Zuk, was indicted on seven counts for transmitting, receiving, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Robinson, No. 16-98 (D.D.C.) (255 F.Supp.3d 100) (June 28, 2017) (Judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly)
  2. U.S. v. Wells, No. 14-30146 (9th Cir.) (879 F.3d 900) (January 11, 2018) (Judge Donald E. Walter)
  3. Hulen, No. 16-30160 (9th Cir.) (879 F.3d 1015) (January 10, 2018) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
  4. U.S. v. Zuk, No. 16-4727 (4th Cir.) (874 F.3d 398) (October 24, 2017) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
  5. U.S. v. Tigano, No. 15-3073 (2nd Cir.) (880 F.3d 602) (January 23, 2018) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)

More from these topics: