Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Rosales-Mireles v. U.S., No. 16-9493 (U.S. Supreme Court) (585 U.S. ___; 138 S.Ct. 1897) (June 18, 2018) (Justice Sotomayor)

Loaded on June 11, 2018 published in Punch and Jurists June 11, 2018
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Rebuttable Presumption.

In this case, the Supreme Court addressed the scope of “plain error” review for unobjected-to Guidelines miscalculations at sentencing; and its decision announced some significant and far-reaching rules about determining when a sentencing error “affects the substantial rights” of a defendant, as that phrase is used in Rule 52(b) of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Carpenter v. U.S., No. 16-402 (U.S. Supreme Court) (585 U.S. ___; 138 S.Ct. 2206) (June 22, 2018) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)
  2. Chavez-Meza v. U.S., No. 17-5639 (U.S. Supreme Court) (585 U.S. ___; 138 S.Ct. 1959) (June 28, 2018) (Justice Breyer)
  3. Rosales-Mireles v. U.S., No. 16-9493 (U.S. Supreme Court) (585 U.S. ___; 138 S.Ct. 1897) (June 18, 2018) (Justice Sotomayor)
  4. Currier v. Virginia, No. 16-1348 (U.S. Supreme Court) (585 U.S. ___; 138 S.Ct. 2144) (June 22, 2018) (Justice Gorsuch)
  5. U.S. v. Vera, No. 16-50364 (9th Cir.) (893 F.3d 689) (June 25, 2018) (Judge John B. Owens)
  6. U.S. v. Swallow, No. 16-30224 (9th Cir.) (891 F.3d 1203) (June 11, 2018) (Judge Paul J. Watford)

More from these topics: