Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: January 10, 2005

Issue PDF
Volume 12, Number 2

In this issue:

  1. Melton v. U.S., No. 03-3903 (7th Cir.) (359 F.3d 855) (February 13, 2004) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook) (p None)
  2. U.S. v. Nellum, No. 2-04-CR-30 PS (N.D.Ind.) (2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1568) (February 3, 2005) (Judge Philip P. Simon) (p None)
  3. U.S. v. Huerta-Rodriguez, No. 8:93CR365 (D.Neb.) (355 F.Supp.2d 1019) (February 1, 2005) (Judge Joseph F. Bataillon) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Wise, No. 03-30274 (9th Cir.) (391 F.3d 1027) (December 8, 2004) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Siegelbaum, No. CR No. 02-179-01-PA (D.Or.) (359 F.Supp.2d 1104) (January 24, 2005) (Judge Owen M. Panner) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 04-12676 (11th Cir.) (398 F.3d 1291) (February 4, 2005) (Judge Edward E. Carnes) (p None)
  7. Rucker v. U.S., No. 2:04-CV-00914PGC (D.Utah) (382 F.Supp.2d 1288) (February 10, 2005) (Judge Paul G. Cassell) (p None)
  8. Prison Legal News v. Lehman, No. 03-35608 (9th Cir.) (397 F.3d 692) (February 1, 2005) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon) (p None)
  9. U.S. v. Wilson, No. 2:03-CR-00882 PGC (D.Utah) (355 F.Supp.2d 1269) (February 2, 2005) (Judge Paul G. Cassell) (p None)
  10. U.S. v. Antelope, No. 03-30334 (9th Cir.) (395 F.3d 1128) (January 27, 2005) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown) (p None)
  11. U.S. v. Talebnejad, No. CRIM.PJM 03-0517 (D.Md.) (342 F.Supp.2d 346) (September 28, 2004) (Judge Peter J. Messitte) (p None)
  12. U.S. v. Hicks, No. 03-40655 (5th Cir.) (389 F.3d 514) (November 2, 2004) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King) (p None)
  13. A.C.L.U. v. Department of Defense, No. 04 CIV. 4151 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y.) (351 F.Supp.2d 265) (February 2, 2005) (Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein) (p None)
  14. U.S. v. Webb, No. 03-6110 (6th Cir.) (403 F.3d 373) (April 6, 2005) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore) (p None)

Melton v. U.S., No. 03-3903 (7th Cir.) (359 F.3d 855) (February 13, 2004) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

Here the Court dismissed the prisoner's self-styled petition for a writ of audita querela, concluding that it was, in substance, a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for which he had not received the court's permission to file. In its review of the limited and ever declining ...

U.S. v. Nellum, No. 2-04-CR-30 PS (N.D.Ind.) (2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1568) (February 3, 2005) (Judge Philip P. Simon)

The 57-year old defendant in this case was a relatively small-time crack dealer who was convicted of distributing crack-cocaine; and his Guideline sentencing range was 168-210 months. After carefully computing the defendant's guideline range, Judge Simon then turned to consider the 3553(a) factors. In so doing, Judge Simon concluded that ...

U.S. v. Huerta-Rodriguez, No. 8:93CR365 (D.Neb.) (355 F.Supp.2d 1019) (February 1, 2005) (Judge Joseph F. Bataillon)

U.S. v. Wise, No. 03-30274 (9th Cir.) (391 F.3d 1027) (December 8, 2004) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)

The defendant, who pled guilty to attempting to defraud the Social Security Administration, appealed from the imposition of a special condition of supervised release that barred her from having contact with children under the age of 18 years of age. Citing the defendant’s “lurid history,” the Court rejected her contention ...

U.S. v. Siegelbaum, No. CR No. 02-179-01-PA (D.Or.) (359 F.Supp.2d 1104) (January 24, 2005) (Judge Owen M. Panner)

U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 04-12676 (11th Cir.) (398 F.3d 1291) (February 4, 2005) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)

U.S. v. Labastida-Segura, 396 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 02/04/2005) (Judge Kelly)
U.S. v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 02/04/05) (Judge Carnes)

One of the major Booker disagreements that has developed among the Circuit courts relates to the burden of proof required to obtain a remand for a resentencing based ...

Rucker v. U.S., No. 2:04-CV-00914PGC (D.Utah) (382 F.Supp.2d 1288) (February 10, 2005) (Judge Paul G. Cassell)

Prison Legal News v. Lehman, No. 03-35608 (9th Cir.) (397 F.3d 692) (February 1, 2005) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)

U.S. v. Wilson, No. 2:03-CR-00882 PGC (D.Utah) (355 F.Supp.2d 1269) (February 2, 2005) (Judge Paul G. Cassell)

U.S. v. Antelope, No. 03-30334 (9th Cir.) (395 F.3d 1128) (January 27, 2005) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

In this case, the Court addressed the constitutionality of a popular sex offender treatment program, known as the Sexual Abuse Behavior Evaluation and Recovery program (“SABER”). The program subjects participants to mandatory “periodic and random polygraph examinations” that require full disclosure of the participant’s sexual history, without any immunity from ...

U.S. v. Talebnejad, No. CRIM.PJM 03-0517 (D.Md.) (342 F.Supp.2d 346) (September 28, 2004) (Judge Peter J. Messitte)

In this case, Judge Messitte dismissed, as “fatally infirm,” an indictment that charged three Arab defendants with conducting an unlicensed money transmitting business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1960, as amended in 2001 by the USA PATRIOT Act. While the Court rejected a series of constitutional challenges to breadth ...

U.S. v. Hicks, No. 03-40655 (5th Cir.) (389 F.3d 514) (November 2, 2004) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)

This case is noted for its detailed discussion of the admissibility of ballistics evidence and testimony under the standards for reliability established in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). The defendant contended that the district court had abused its discretion by admitting, over his pre-trial and ...

A.C.L.U. v. Department of Defense, No. 04 CIV. 4151 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y.) (351 F.Supp.2d 265) (February 2, 2005) (Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein)

In this Freedom of Information Act ruling, District Judge Alvin Hellerstein rejected an attempt by the C.I.A. to delay indefinitely the processing and release of critical documents pertaining to the torture or abuse of detainees held by the Government. The ruling relates to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request ...

U.S. v. Webb, No. 03-6110 (6th Cir.) (403 F.3d 373) (April 6, 2005) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)

In this case, the Court addressed some important open Booker issues, including: (1) the impact of joint recommendations and stipulations in a pre-Booker plea agreement; (2) the (rare) instances in which a Booker error might not be prejudicial to the defendant; and (3) the elements to be considered in determining ...