Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: March 23, 2009

Issue PDF
Volume 16, Number 11

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Tomko, No. 05-4997 (3rd Cir.) (498 F.3d 157) (August 20, 2007) (Judge D. Michael Fisher) (p None)
  2. U.S. v. Olhovsky, No. 07-1642 (3rd Cir.) (562 F.3d 530) (April 16, 2009) (Judge Theodore A. McKee) (p None)
  3. Musladin v. Lamarque, No. 03-16653 (9th Cir.) (555 F.3d 830) (February 12, 2009) (Judge Marsha L. Berzon) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Webb, No. 08-13405 (11th Cir.) (565 F.3d 789) (April 13, 2009) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Shaygan, No. 08-20112-CR-GOLD (S.D.Fla.) (661 F.Supp.2d 1289) (April 9, 2009) (Judge Alan S. Gold) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Stevens, No. 08-231(EGS) (D.D.C.) (593 F.Supp.2d 177) (January 16, 2009) (Judge Emmet G. Sullivan) (p None)
  7. U.S. v. Tomko, No. 05-4997 (3rd Cir.) (562 F.3d 558) (April 17, 2009) (Judge D. Brooks Smith) (p None)
  8. U.S. v. Aquino, No. 07-3202 (3rd Cir.) (555 F.3d 124) (February 6, 2009) (Judge Maryanne Trump Barry) (p None)
  9. U.S. v. Nacchio, No. 07-1311 (10th Cir.) (555 F.3d 1234) (February 25, 2009) (Judge Jerome A. Holmes) (p None)
  10. Poindexter v. U.S., No. 07-1151-pr (2nd Cir.) (556 F.3d 87) (February 10, 2009) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  11. U.S. v. Paul, No. 08-30125 (9th Cir.) (561 F.3d 970) (April 2, 2009) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  12. Arizona v. Gant, No. 07-542 (U.S. Supreme Court) (556 U.S. 332; 129 S.Ct. 1710) (April 21, 2009) (Justice Stevens) (p None)

U.S. v. Tomko, No. 05-4997 (3rd Cir.) (498 F.3d 157) (August 20, 2007) (Judge D. Michael Fisher)

In this lengthy (66-page) decision, a divided panel from the Third Circuit vacated a probation-only sentence for tax evasion as substantively unreasonable. The majority and dissenting opinions represent the most detailed analysis we have seen to date of the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. Rita, 127 S.Ct. 2456 (2007), ...

U.S. v. Olhovsky, No. 07-1642 (3rd Cir.) (562 F.3d 530) (April 16, 2009) (Judge Theodore A. McKee)

Here the Court rejected as unreasonable a below Guidelines sentence imposed in a child pornography case because the district court failed to comport with the mandates of the so-called parsimony provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

This lengthy and intriguing child pornography sentencing decision appears to be the first reported ...

Musladin v. Lamarque, No. 03-16653 (9th Cir.) (555 F.3d 830) (February 12, 2009) (Judge Marsha L. Berzon)

The petitioner, Mathew Musladin, was convicted of first degree murder and, after pursuing his state court remedies without success, he appealed to the Federal courts for habeas relief. After his petition was denied by the district court, the Ninth Circuit reversed in a prior decision on the ground that buttons ...

U.S. v. Webb, No. 08-13405 (11th Cir.) (565 F.3d 789) (April 13, 2009) (Per Curiam)

This case is noted for its holding that there is no right to counsel at crack-cocaine sentence modification proceedings pursuant to Guidelines Amendment 706 and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Amendment 706 (which became effective Nov. 1, 2008; and which was further amended by Guidelines Amendment 713, which became effective on ...

U.S. v. Shaygan, No. 08-20112-CR-GOLD (S.D.Fla.) (661 F.Supp.2d 1289) (April 9, 2009) (Judge Alan S. Gold)

In this decision, Judge Gold blasted Federal prosecutors for their mean-spirited and vindictive conduct that constituted “unethical behavior” and for acting “vexatiously and in bad faith” in its prosecution of Dr. Ali Shaygan, a Miami Beach physician, who was acquitted of 141 counts of illegally prescribing painkillers. Judge Gold also ...

U.S. v. Stevens, No. 08-231(EGS) (D.D.C.) (593 F.Supp.2d 177) (January 16, 2009) (Judge Emmet G. Sullivan)

This ruling, and Judge Sullivan's similar ruling in Batarfi v. Bush, No. 05-0409 (EGS) (D.D.C. Mar. 13, 2009) (which is available at https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2005cv0409-170), are noted as evidence of the fact that Judge Sullivan has grown weary of repeated acts of prosecutorial misconduct by Federal prosecutors in cases before his Court ...

U.S. v. Tomko, No. 05-4997 (3rd Cir.) (562 F.3d 558) (April 17, 2009) (Judge D. Brooks Smith)

The issue before the en banc Third Circuit in this case was whether a sentence of probation and house arrest imposed on a wealthy confessed tax cheat was reasonable under the standards established by Gall v. U.S., 128 S.Ct. 587 (2007), and its progeny. In response to that question, Judge ...

U.S. v. Aquino, No. 07-3202 (3rd Cir.) (555 F.3d 124) (February 6, 2009) (Judge Maryanne Trump Barry)

This is the first reported decision to discuss the factors that differentiate two related but separate Guidelines provisions - namely U.S.S.G. §§ 2M3.2 and 2M3.3 which relate to the illegal gathering of national defense information.

This is the first reported decision to discuss an issue that has not previously been ...

U.S. v. Nacchio, No. 07-1311 (10th Cir.) (555 F.3d 1234) (February 25, 2009) (Judge Jerome A. Holmes)

The defendant was convicted at trial of multiple counts of insider trading. During the trial, the district court granted the Government's motion to exclude defendant's expert-testimony evidence. On appeal, in a decision reported at 519 F.3d 1140, a divided reversed and remanded for a new trial. The Tenth Circuit granted ...

Poindexter v. U.S., No. 07-1151-pr (2nd Cir.) (556 F.3d 87) (February 10, 2009) (Per Curiam)

In conviction for one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute an unspecified quantity of cocaine, denial of petition to reduce imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is affirmed where: 1) petitioner's appeal challenged only the calculation of the base offense level, and not ...

U.S. v. Paul, No. 08-30125 (9th Cir.) (561 F.3d 970) (April 2, 2009) (Per Curiam)

In an earlier, unpublished decision reported at U.S. v. Paul, 239 Fed. Appx. 353 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2007) (P&J, 07/16/07) (“Paul !”), a panel from the Ninth Circuit reversed a within-Guidelines sentence of 16 months as substantively unreasonable. That ruling evoked a lot of attention because it was (and, ...

Arizona v. Gant, No. 07-542 (U.S. Supreme Court) (556 U.S. 332; 129 S.Ct. 1710) (April 21, 2009) (Justice Stevens)

In an important Fourth Amendment decision, the Supreme Court held that the police need a warrant to search the vehicle of someone they have arrested if the person is locked up in a patrol cruiser and poses no safety threat to officers.

In theory, the decision attaches new limits on ...