Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: June 15, 2009

Issue PDF
Volume 16, Number 23

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Ness, No. 05-4401-cr (2nd Cir.) (565 F.3d 73) (May 8, 2009) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter) (p None)
  2. Samford v. Dretke, No. 06-20443 (5th Cir.) (562 F.3d 675) (March 3, 2009) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  3. U.S. v. Medford, No. 1:07cr122 (W.D.N.C.) (608 F.Supp.2d 709) (April 16, 2009) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Grant, No. 07-3831 (6th Cir.) (567 F.3d 776) (June 9, 2009) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Brown, No. 07-CR-874 (KAM) (E.D.N.Y.) (606 F.Supp.2d 306) (March 9, 2009) (Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Crabtree, No. 08-4411 (4th Cir.) (565 F.3d 887) (May 19, 2009) (Judge William B. Jr. Traxler) (p None)
  7. In Re: Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation, No. Misc. No. 08-0442 (TFH) (D.D.C.) (630 F.Supp.2d 1) (June 1, 2009) (Judge Thomas F. Hogan) (p None)
  8. Mills v. District of Columbia, No. 08-7127 (D.C. Cir.) (571 F.3d 1304) (July 10, 2009) (Judge David B. Sentelle) (p None)

U.S. v. Ness, No. 05-4401-cr (2nd Cir.) (565 F.3d 73) (May 8, 2009) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)

Conviction for conspiring to commit three money laundering offenses is reversed where: 1) a reasonable jury could not find beyond a reasonable doubt that the purpose of defendant's transportation of narcotics proceeds was to conceal the nature, location, or source of the narcotics proceeds; and 2) the government failed to ...

Samford v. Dretke, No. 06-20443 (5th Cir.) (562 F.3d 675) (March 3, 2009) (Per Curiam)

In this case, Scott Samford, a Texas state inmate who is serving a 20 year sentence, appealed from the dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Texas prison officials on the grounds that his complaint was both frivolous and failed to state a claim under 28 ...

U.S. v. Medford, No. 1:07cr122 (W.D.N.C.) (608 F.Supp.2d 709) (April 16, 2009) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis)

In a case of potential far-reaching consequence, Judge Ellis ordered the defendant to make monthly payments of $3,500 throughout his entire 180 months of incarceration (a grand total of $630,000) to reimburse the Government for his CJA counsel fees, even though, at sentencing, Judge Ellis found that the defendant lacked ...

U.S. v. Grant, No. 07-3831 (6th Cir.) (567 F.3d 776) (June 9, 2009) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)

Here a divided panel held that, when considering a Government motion to reduce a defendant’s sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), the district court may consider factors beyond just the defendant’s substantial assistance.

Rule 35(b)(1) of the Fed.R.Crim.P. provides that a district court may reduce a defendant’s sentence if the Government ...

U.S. v. Brown, No. 07-CR-874 (KAM) (E.D.N.Y.) (606 F.Supp.2d 306) (March 9, 2009) (Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto)

In a decision that provides a lot of insights into the purposes of, and the burdens of proof under, Fed.R.Evid. 609(a)( and (b), Judge Kiyo Matusmoto presented a studious analysis of her reasons for refusing to allow the Government to cross-examine one of the defendants in this case about a ...

U.S. v. Crabtree, No. 08-4411 (4th Cir.) (565 F.3d 887) (May 19, 2009) (Judge William B. Jr. Traxler)

This is an interesting decision in which the Fourth Circuit vacated a defendant’s conviction and two-year sentence for violating the terms of his supervised release because the district court had committed reversible error by admitting into evidence recordings made by the defendant’s ex-girlfriend in violation of Title III.

While on ...

In Re: Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation, No. Misc. No. 08-0442 (TFH) (D.D.C.) (630 F.Supp.2d 1) (June 1, 2009) (Judge Thomas F. Hogan)

This 19-page ruling by Judge Hogan underscores some of the Government-created obstacles to the ending of the autocratic and arbitrary detention policies at Guantanamo Bay and to the implementation , in any fair and meaningful manner, of the Supreme Court’s mandates in Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. ...

Mills v. District of Columbia, No. 08-7127 (D.C. Cir.) (571 F.3d 1304) (July 10, 2009) (Judge David B. Sentelle)

Here the Court held that the police department’s establishment of suspicionless checkpoints that blocked entry into a crime-ridden neighborhood constituted an unconstitutional seizure under the Fourth Amendment since there was no individualized suspicion.

In this case, a unanimous panel from the D.C. Circuit overruled the district court and held that ...