Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: June 13, 2011

Issue PDF
Volume 18, Number 12

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Tinklenberg, No. 09-1498 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 647; 131 S.Ct. 2007) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Breyer) (p None)
  2. DePierre v. U.S., No. 09-1533 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 70; 131 S.Ct. 2225) (June 9, 2011) (Justice Sotomayor) (p None)
  3. Fowler v. U.S., No. 10-5443 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 668; 131 S.Ct. 2045) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Breyer) (p None)
  4. Camreta v. Greene, No. 09-1454 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 692; 131 S.Ct. 2020) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Kagan) (p None)
  5. Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, No. 10-98 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 731; 131 S.Ct. 2074) (May 31, 2011) (Justice Scalia) (p None)
  6. McNeill v. U.S., No. 10-5258 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 816; 131 S.Ct. 2218) (June 6, 2011) (Justice Thomas) (p None)
  7. Sykes v. U.S., No. 09-11311 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 1; 131 S.Ct. 2267) (June 9, 2011) (Justice Kennedy) (p None)

U.S. v. Tinklenberg, No. 09-1498 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 647; 131 S.Ct. 2007) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Breyer)

In a tedious and labyrinthine decision involving the statutory interpretation of two different provisions of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (“STA”), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Circuit had incorrectly interpreted both provisions. However, the Court also concluded that the Circuit’s twin errors canceled each other out; and ...

DePierre v. U.S., No. 09-1533 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 70; 131 S.Ct. 2225) (June 9, 2011) (Justice Sotomayor)

Here the Court finally resolved the longstanding dispute among the Circuit Courts over the correct meaning of the term “cocaine base” as used in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1), and held it includes all cocaine in its chemically basic form, not just crack cocaine.

Back in 1986, when Congress enacted the ...

Fowler v. U.S., No. 10-5443 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 668; 131 S.Ct. 2045) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Breyer)

Here, a sharply divided Court debated the burden of proof required to obtain a conviction under the Federal witness tampering statute, namely 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C); and ultimately chose, over a strong dissent, a “reasonable likelihood” standard.

The Federal witness tampering statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C), makes it a crime ...

Camreta v. Greene, No. 09-1454 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 692; 131 S.Ct. 2020) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Kagan)

[Editor's Note: Because the Court essentially decided that the main issue in this closely watched case regarding qualified immunity was “moot,” and because the Court therefore declined to rule on the underlying Fourth Amendment issue, the Court’s ruling will have limited precedential value. However, for those interested in a more ...

Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, No. 10-98 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 731; 131 S.Ct. 2074) (May 31, 2011) (Justice Scalia)

Here a unanimous Court held that former AG Ashcroft was immune from suit for using the Material Witness Statute as a pretext for detaining suspected terrorists; but four of the Justices raised serious questions about the Government's use of that statute.

In Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 580 F.3d 949 (9th Cir. ...

McNeill v. U.S., No. 10-5258 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 816; 131 S.Ct. 2218) (June 6, 2011) (Justice Thomas)

Here a unanimous Court held that, for purposes of determining whether a state crime qualifies as a serious drug offense under the ACCA, the district court must look to the sentence that was in effect at the time the crime was committed.

Sykes v. U.S., 564 U.S. ___, 131 S,Ct. ...

Sykes v. U.S., No. 09-11311 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 1; 131 S.Ct. 2267) (June 9, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)

Sykes v. U.S., 564 U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 2267 (U.S. Sup. Ct. June 9, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)
McNeill v. U.S., 563 U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 2218 (U.S. Sup. Ct. June 6, 2011) (Justice Thomas)

Both of these cases address broad and poorly defined terms that Congress used when it enacted ...