Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Punch and Jurists: July 9, 2012

Issue PDF
Volume 19, Number 14

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Stewart, No. 10-3185 (2nd Cir.) (686 F.3d 156) (June 28, 2012) (Judge Robert D. Sack) (p None)
  2. U.S. v. Lomeli, No. 11-1549 (8th Cir.) (676 F.3d 734) (April 18, 2012) (Judge C. Arlen Beam) (p None)
  3. U.S. v. Alvarez, No. 11-210 (U.S. Supreme Court) (567 U.S. 709; 132 S.Ct. 2537) (June 28, 2012) (Justice Kennedy) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. White Twin, No. 11-3206 (8th Cir.) (682 F.3d 773) (June 27, 2012) (Judge William Duane Benton) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Ramos, No. 10-4802-cr (2nd Cir.) (685 F.3d 120) (July 2, 2012) (Judge Denny Chin) (p None)

U.S. v. Stewart, No. 10-3185 (2nd Cir.) (686 F.3d 156) (June 28, 2012) (Judge Robert D. Sack)

Loaded on July 9, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists July 09, 2012
Filed under: First Amendment, Punch And Jurists.

Sentence for convictions of conspiracy to defraud the US, 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to provide and to conceal the provision of material support to a conspiracy to kill and kidnap persons in a foreign country, 18 U.S.C. § 371, providing and concealing the provision of material support to a ...

U.S. v. Lomeli, No. 11-1549 (8th Cir.) (676 F.3d 734) (April 18, 2012) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)

Loaded on July 9, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists July 09, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Wiretap Evidence.

U.S. v. Alvarez, No. 11-210 (U.S. Supreme Court) (567 U.S. 709; 132 S.Ct. 2537) (June 28, 2012) (Justice Kennedy)

Loaded on July 9, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists July 09, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Stolen Valor Act.

U.S. v. White Twin, No. 11-3206 (8th Cir.) (682 F.3d 773) (June 27, 2012) (Judge William Duane Benton)

Loaded on July 9, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists July 09, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Reasonableness of Sentence.

U.S. v. Ramos, No. 10-4802-cr (2nd Cir.) (685 F.3d 120) (July 2, 2012) (Judge Denny Chin)

Loaded on Dec. 1, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists July 09, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Polygraph Evidence/Testing.

Conviction of receiving and possessing child pornography is affirmed over claims that: 1) defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was violated because he was compelled as a parolee to make self-incriminating statements during a mandatory polygraph examination; and 2) the government failed to present sufficient evidence to prove he received ...