Loaded on
March 19, 2012
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2012
U.S. v. McKnight, 665 F.3d 786 (7th Cir. Nov. 22, 2011) (Judge Kenneth Ripple)
U.S. v. McKnight, No. 10-2297 (7th Cir. Feb. 6, 2012) (Per Curiam)
After a four-year investigation by the DEA and the Chicago police, a Federal grand jury indicted Ondray McKnight and six co-defendants for various crimes ...
Loaded on
March 19, 2012
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2012
Here the Court held that (a) the right to bear arms includes the right to carry guns outside the home; and (b) that Maryland’s restrictive gun carrying licensing scheme was unconstitutional since it was not sufficiently tailored to the State’s interests.
There seems to be a new surge in the ...
Loaded on
March 19, 2012
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2012
U.S. v. McKnight, 665 F.3d 786 (7th Cir. Nov. 22, 2011) (Judge Kenneth Ripple)
U.S. v. McKnight, No. 10-2297 (7th Cir. Feb. 6, 2012) (Per Curiam)
After a four-year investigation by the DEA and the Chicago police, a Federal grand jury indicted Ondray McKnight and six co-defendants for various crimes ...
Loaded on
March 19, 2012
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2012
This case is a continuation of efforts by six defendants, who were alleged members of the Pagans Motorcycle Club (“PMC”), to dismiss a number of counts of an Indictment that charged them with possessing firearms “while being employed” for a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h). According ...
Loaded on
March 19, 2012
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2012
Here the Court held that minimally intrusive searches of a cell phone during a search incident to an arrest are permitted under the Fourth Amendment ; but more extensive searches may require more justification or maybe even a warrant.
With more than a typical dash of his famed flair for ...
Loaded on
March 19, 2012
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2012
Here a unanimous Supreme Court held that the proper standard to be used when someone facing a death sentence requests that his appointed counsel be replaced under 18 USC § 3599 is the “interests of justice” standard that used under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A.
The respondent in this case, Kenneth ...
Loaded on
March 19, 2012
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2012
This is an interesting Second Amendment decision in which a divided panel from the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit seeking the return of a gun that had been seized by the police on the grounds that “the right protected by the Second Amendment is not a property-like ...