Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: May 13, 2013

Issue PDF
Volume 20, Number 10

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. D.M., No. 12-CR-170 (E.D.N.Y.) (942 F.Supp.2d 327) (May 3, 2013) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) (p None)
  2. In re Warrant to Search a Target Computer, No. H–13–234M (S.D.Tex.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (April 22, 2013) (Judge Magistrate) (p None)
  3. National Rifle Association v. B.A.T.F., No. 11-10959 (5th Cir.) (714 F.3d 334) (April 30, 2013) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Sivilla, No. 11-50484 (9th Cir.) (714 F.3d 1168) (May 7, 2013) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Savini, No. 11-4359 (2nd Cir.) (716 F.3d 56) (May 7, 2013) (Judge Jane R. Roth) (p None)

U.S. v. D.M., No. 12-CR-170 (E.D.N.Y.) (942 F.Supp.2d 327) (May 3, 2013) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

In a rare and noteworthy Sentencing Memorandum that shows exceptional diligence in the pursuit of a fair and justice sentence, Judge Weinstein explained his reasons for imposing a non-Guidelines sentence of probation on a 22-year old man identified as D.M., who pled guilty to one count of possession of child ...

In re Warrant to Search a Target Computer, No. H–13–234M (S.D.Tex.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (April 22, 2013) (Judge Magistrate)

Here the Court denied the Government’s “novel request” for a warrant to search an unknown computer at an unknown location after concluding that the Government’s application did not satisfy any of the limits specified in Rule 41(b) of the Fed.R.Crim.P.

This case is a revealing example of the open disdain ...

National Rifle Association v. B.A.T.F., No. 11-10959 (5th Cir.) (714 F.3d 334) (April 30, 2013) (Per Curiam)

With increasing fervor and ferocity, the National Rifle Association (“NRA”) is accelerating its all-out assault on gun control laws of every type and description throughout the United States - perhaps in an effort to crush any new gun control measures with its own “shock and awe” campaign.

The instant appeal ...

U.S. v. Sivilla, No. 11-50484 (9th Cir.) (714 F.3d 1168) (May 7, 2013) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)

In this case, the Ninth Circuit vacated a criminal conviction and remanded for a new trial, after concluding that the district court committed reversible error by failing to give a requested remedial jury instruction to account for the government's negligent destruction of potentially exculpatory evidence. However, the Court also clarified ...

U.S. v. Savini, No. 11-4359 (2nd Cir.) (716 F.3d 56) (May 7, 2013) (Judge Jane R. Roth)

The issued addressed in this decision was whether a defendant, who was previously convicted of a crack cocaine offense and who received a downward departure based on rendering substantial assistance to the Government, is also eligible to apply for a further retroactive sentence reduction based on the provisions of the ...