Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: November 23, 2015

Issue PDF
Volume 22, Number 18

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Johnsted, No. 12-cr-146-wmc (W.D.Wisc.) (30 F.Supp.3d 814) (October 8, 2013) (Judge William M. Conley) (p None)
  2. Doe v. Hesketh, No. Civ. No. 13-4935 (E.D.Pa.) (77 F.Supp.3d 440) (January 9, 2015) (Judge Stewart Dalzell) (p None)
  3. Kane v. Lewis, No. 14-1027 (4th Cir.) (604 Fed.Appx. 229) (March 13, 2015) (Judge Allyson Kay Duncan) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Dreyer, No. 13-30077 (9th Cir.) (804 F.3d 1266) (November 4, 2015) (Judge Morgan Christen) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Johnsted, No. 12-cr-146-wme (W.D.Wisc.) (30 F.Supp.3d 814) (October 8, 2013) (Judge William M. Conley) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Matusiewicz, No. Crim, No, 13-83 (D.Del.) (84 F.Supp.3d 363) (March 26, 2015) (Judge Gerald A. McHugh) (p None)

U.S. v. Johnsted, No. 12-cr-146-wmc (W.D.Wisc.) (30 F.Supp.3d 814) (October 8, 2013) (Judge William M. Conley)

Doe v. Hesketh, No. Civ. No. 13-4935 (E.D.Pa.) (77 F.Supp.3d 440) (January 9, 2015) (Judge Stewart Dalzell)

This is a civil case in which the plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe in the caption of the case, sued a class of defendants for statutory damages under a Federal law known as “Masha’s Law,” which was enacted by Congress in 2006 to provide statutory redress for victims of crimes ...

Kane v. Lewis, No. 14-1027 (4th Cir.) (604 Fed.Appx. 229) (March 13, 2015) (Judge Allyson Kay Duncan)

This case is more than just another example of the evils of the over-the-top, nighttime, military style drug raids that have become all-too-common in America. It is also a case that exposes the appalling failure of the judicial system to put any meaningful and consistent reins on the excessive culture ...

U.S. v. Dreyer, No. 13-30077 (9th Cir.) (804 F.3d 1266) (November 4, 2015) (Judge Morgan Christen)

Here the en banc Court held that, despte extensive participation of the NCIS in a civilian criminal investigation that clearly violated the Posse Comitatus Act, suppression of the evidence was not waranted under the facts of this case.

In the October 20, 2014 issue of P&J, we noted a decision ...

U.S. v. Johnsted, No. 12-cr-146-wme (W.D.Wisc.) (30 F.Supp.3d 814) (October 8, 2013) (Judge William M. Conley)

In this case, Judge Conley denied the Government’s request to introduce expert opinion testimony from a U.S. Postal Service handwriting expert to the effect that the hand printing on an envelope and a letter belonged to the defendant. After reviewing the expert witness’ proposed opinion testimony for both relevance and ...

U.S. v. Matusiewicz, No. Crim, No, 13-83 (D.Del.) (84 F.Supp.3d 363) (March 26, 2015) (Judge Gerald A. McHugh)

This case is noted because it represents the very first convictions for cyberstalking resulting in death that have been achieved under the broad and potent provisions of the Federal cyberstalking statute (18 U.S.C. § 2261A) - and that milestone will undoubtedly encourage Federal prosecutors throughout the country to bring more ...