Loaded on
May 28, 2018
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2018
This decision addressed a question at the intersection of two important components of the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence: the automobile exception to the warrant requirement and the protection extended to the curtilage of a home. More specifically, the question at issue was whether the automobile exception to the Fourth ...
Loaded on
May 28, 2018
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2018
In 2013, Erik Hughes was indicted for conspiracy with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of methamphetamine and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Although Hughes’s Guideline sentencing range (GSR) was 188 to 235 months, Hughes was sentenced to 150 months after the Court accepted his Type ...
Loaded on
May 28, 2018
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2018
In the Spring of 2014, the U.S. Sentencing Commission submitted to Congress its much ballyhooed sentence reduction program for drug trafficking offenders by changing how the base offense levels in the drug or chemical quantity tables in sections 2D1.1 and 2D1.11 of the Guidelines Manual incorporate the statutory mandatory minimum ...
Loaded on
May 28, 2018
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2018
Here the Court granted a defense motion for a new trial after finding that the Government’s “inadvertent failure” to provide Jencks Act materials to defense counsel until after the trial was over did not constitute harmless error.
Jamal Russell was one of twenty-one defendants indicted in connection with a conspiracy ...
Loaded on
May 28, 2018
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2018
U.S. v. Nawanna, CR-17-4019 (N.D.Iowa May 1, 2018) (District Judge Mark Bennett)
U.S. v. Harry, CR-17-1017 4019 (N.D.Iowa June 6, 2018) (District Judge Leonard Strand)
In these two cases, different judges in the Northern District of Iowa announced that they disagree, on policy grounds, with the Guidelines’ treatment of methamphetamine ...
Loaded on
May 28, 2018
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2018
In this case, the Supreme Court addressed the following question: Does the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(b)(4), cover costs that were neither “required nor requested” by the Government, including costs incurred for the victim’s own purposes and that were not prompted by any official government ...
Loaded on
May 28, 2018
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2018
U.S. v. Nawanna, CR-17-4019 (N.D.Iowa May 1, 2018) (District Judge Mark Bennett)
U.S. v. Harry, CR-17-1017 4019 (N.D.Iowa June 6, 2018) (District Judge Leonard Strand)
In these two cases, different judges in the Northern District of Iowa announced that they disagree, on policy grounds, with the Guidelines’ treatment of methamphetamine ...