Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: July 1, 1996

Issue PDF
Volume 3, Number 27

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Raposa, No. 95-2088 (1st Cir.) (84 F.3d 502) (May 29, 1996) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch) (p None)
  2. U.S. v. Raposa, No. 95-2088 (1st Cir.) (84 F.3d 502) (May 29, 1996) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch) (p None)
  3. U.S. v. Gossens, No. 95-5520 (4th Cir.) (84 F.3d 697) (May 28, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Gossens, No. 95-5520 (4th Cir.) (84 F.3d 697) (May 28, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-1143(L) (2nd Cir.) (114 F.3d 400) (June 12, 1997) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 95-1882 (7th Cir.) (84 F.3d 931) (May 21, 1996) (Judge William J. Bauer) (p None)

U.S. v. Raposa, No. 95-2088 (1st Cir.) (84 F.3d 502) (May 29, 1996) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)

Case discusses whether sentencing courts may consider illegally seized evidence at sentencing.

U.S. v. Raposa, No. 95-2088 (1st Cir.) (84 F.3d 502) (May 29, 1996) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)

One of the most important provisions contained in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines is an oft overlooked sentence in Application Note 1(a) to §3E1.1 which states that "A defendant may remain silent in respect to relevant conduct beyond the offense of conviction without affecting his ability to obtain a reduction" of ...

U.S. v. Gossens, No. 95-5520 (4th Cir.) (84 F.3d 697) (May 28, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)

One of the standard conditions of probation and supervised release set forth in § 5B1.4 is the provision contained in subparagraph (a)(12) which prohibits the defendant from entering into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of any law enforcement agency without the permission of the ...

U.S. v. Gossens, No. 95-5520 (4th Cir.) (84 F.3d 697) (May 28, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)

One of the issues addressed in this case was whether the district court had erred by granting a downward departure, under § 5K2.13, based on its finding that the defendant suffered from a significantly reduced mental capacity that contributed to his offenses. At the sentencing hearing, the defendant presented a ...

U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-1143(L) (2nd Cir.) (114 F.3d 400) (June 12, 1997) (Per Curiam)

When they want you, they'll get you. Here the district court (Judge Elfvin) refused to impose a three level enhancement for committing an additional crime while on bail release because the language contained in the bail release form was "in very small print" and was "dense legal language", which it ...

U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 95-1882 (7th Cir.) (84 F.3d 931) (May 21, 1996) (Judge William J. Bauer)

Here the Court held that a prior marijuana conviction was similar enough to the charged crimes of distribution of of cocaine and heroin as to be admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) to show "intent".

In this case, involving the distribution of cocaine and heroin, the defendant argued that the district court ...