Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: May 26, 1997

Issue PDF
Volume 4, Number 21

In this issue:

  1. Boero v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 96-2158 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 301) (April 14, 1997) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs) (p None)
  2. Holland v. O'Bryant, No. 96-00997 (D.D.C.) (958 F.Supp. 10) (March 27, 1997) (Judge Stanley Sporkin) (p None)
  3. Wright v. Morris, No. 95-1837 (6th Cir.) (111 F.3d 414) (April 11, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Miller, No. 94-8079 (10th Cir.) (111 F.3d 747) (April 25, 1997) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Rector, No. 96-1952 (7th Cir.) (111 F.3d 503) (April 11, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Zagari, No. 96-1130, No. 599 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 307) (April 17, 1997) (Judge James L. Oakes) (p None)
  7. U.S. v. Rouse, No. 95-1554 (8th Cir.) (111 F.3d 561) (April 11, 1997) (Judge James B. Loken) (p None)
  8. U.S. v. Rector, No. 96-1952 (7th Cir.) (111 F.3d 503) (April 11, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion) (p None)
  9. U.S. v. Oakar, No. 96-3084 (D.C. Cir.) (111 F.3d 146) (April 18, 1997) (Judge Judith W. Rogers) (p None)
  10. U.S. v. Isong, No. 96-6050 (6th Cir.) (111 F.3d 428) (April 14, 1997) (Judge David A. Nelson) (p None)
  11. U.S. v. Schneider, No. 96-1281 (1st Cir.) (111 F.3d 197) (April 17, 1997) (Judge Michael Boudin) (p None)
  12. U.S. v. Amaya, No. 96-40572 (5th Cir.) (111 F.3d 386) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Robert M. Parker) (p None)
  13. U.S. v. Zagari, No. 96-1130, No. 599 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 307) (April 17, 1997) (Judge James L. Oakes) (p None)
  14. Thompson v. Souza, No. 96-55662 (9th Cir.) (111 F.3d 694) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Stephen S. Trott) (p None)
  15. U.S. v. Rouse, No. 95-1554 (8th Cir.) (111 F.3d 561) (April 11, 1997) (Judge James B. Loken) (p None)
  16. U.S. v. Amlani, No. 94-50292 (9th Cir.) (111 F.3d 705) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Charles E. Wiggins) (p None)
  17. Thompson v. Souza, No. 96-55662 (9th Cir.) (111 F.3d 694) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Stephen S. Trott) (p None)
  18. U.S. v. Ramnath, No. CR-96-0012 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y.) (958 F.Supp. 99) (February 27, 1997) (Judge Charles P. Sifton) (p None)
  19. U.S. v. Brooks, No. 95-5728 (4th Cir.) (111 F.3d 365) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer) (p None)
  20. Valente v. U.S., No. 96-2505 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 290) (July 14, 1997) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  21. U.S. v. Amaya, No. 96-40572 (5th Cir.) (111 F.3d 386) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Robert M. Parker) (p None)
  22. U.S. v. Cooper, No. 96-6717 (11th Cir.) (111 F.3d 845) (May 5, 1997) (Judge John C. Godbold) (p None)
  23. U.S. v. Zagari, No. 96-1130, No. 599 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 307) (April 17, 1997) (Judge James L. Oakes) (p None)
  24. Jensen v. County of Lake, No. H-74-230 (N.D.Ill.) (958 F.Supp. 397) (March 5, 1997) (Judge Rudy Lozano) (p None)
  25. U.S. v. Green, No. 96-2408 (7th Cir.) (111 F.3d 515) (April 14, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion) (p None)
  26. U.S. v. Coleman, No. 93-00011-05-CR-W-9-6 (W.D.Mo.) (958 F.Supp. 452) (March 27, 1997) (Judge Howard F. Sachs) (p None)
  27. U.S. v. Ramnath, No. CR-96-0012 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y.) (958 F.Supp. 99) (February 27, 1997) (Judge Charles P. Sifton) (p None)

Boero v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 96-2158 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 301) (April 14, 1997) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)

In this case the trial court found that the DEA had failed to comply with the requisite notice requirement for an administrative forfeiture. Though the trial court had the power to correct the deficiency, it instead allowed the defendant-claimant to pursue an administrative remedy over five years from the date ...

Holland v. O'Bryant, No. 96-00997 (D.D.C.) (958 F.Supp. 10) (March 27, 1997) (Judge Stanley Sporkin)

After a search causing large damage the Court held that police officers cannot break into a citizen's home, hide behind a search warrant that is concededly flawed and then attempt to deny just compensation to the citizen it has wronged.

A deepening problem for law enforcement officials and the courts ...

Wright v. Morris, No. 95-1837 (6th Cir.) (111 F.3d 414) (April 11, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)

Case held that PLRA's exhaustion requirement is not retroactive to cover pending appeals.

U.S. v. Miller, No. 94-8079 (10th Cir.) (111 F.3d 747) (April 25, 1997) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)

Here, the indictment charged the defendant with participation in a drug distribution conspiracy "within the District of Wyoming and elsewhere." The defendant lived in Montana; and at trial "no evidence was offered that he had ever traveled to or committed overt acts in Wyoming in furtherance of the conspiracy." After ...

U.S. v. Rector, No. 96-1952 (7th Cir.) (111 F.3d 503) (April 11, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)

Here the Court held that an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, under USSG § 3E1.1, is rarely available to those who assert the defense of entrapment, since that defense by its nature tends to preclude acceptance of responsibility.

U.S. v. Zagari, No. 96-1130, No. 599 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 307) (April 17, 1997) (Judge James L. Oakes)

Defendant was denied downward departure on basis that he was coerced by a crime family, since he had close connections to that family.

U.S. v. Rouse, No. 95-1554 (8th Cir.) (111 F.3d 561) (April 11, 1997) (Judge James B. Loken)

Here the Court held that that hearsay evidence of what three child victims of alleged sexual abuse said during initial interviews with the FBI was admissible under the residual exception of Rule 803(34) - now Rule 807.

U.S. v. Rector, No. 96-1952 (7th Cir.) (111 F.3d 503) (April 11, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)

The Court stated: ""[T]he adjustment [for acceptance of responsibility] is rarely available to those who assert entrapment, a defense that by its nature tends to preclude the acceptance of responsibility.
Essentially, the problem is that asserting entrapment is a denial rather than an acceptance of responsibility. A defendant asserting such ...

U.S. v. Oakar, No. 96-3084 (D.C. Cir.) (111 F.3d 146) (April 18, 1997) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)

Case held that material included in an indictment that can fairly be described as 'surplus' may only be stricken if it is irrelevant and prejudicial." (Id., at 157).

U.S. v. Isong, No. 96-6050 (6th Cir.) (111 F.3d 428) (April 14, 1997) (Judge David A. Nelson)

Over the dissent of Judge Moore, the Court held that a sentence of supervised release was tolled after deportation.

For a contrary view, see U.S. v. Balogun, 140 F.3d 141 (2nd Cir. 1998).

U.S. v. Schneider, No. 96-1281 (1st Cir.) (111 F.3d 197) (April 17, 1997) (Judge Michael Boudin)

This case is noted because of its detailed (albeit non-conclusive) analysis of the purpose and scope of the Insanity Defense Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 17 (the "IDRA"). In addition to redefining insanity and making it an affirmative defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence, that statute also ...

U.S. v. Amaya, No. 96-40572 (5th Cir.) (111 F.3d 386) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Robert M. Parker)

Case held If the guilty plea "is induced by deception, an unfulfillable promise, or misrepresentation to enter a plea of guilty", it is invalid because it is not voluntary.

Justice Lummus of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts once observed: "If all the defendants should combine to refuse to plead ...

U.S. v. Zagari, No. 96-1130, No. 599 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 307) (April 17, 1997) (Judge James L. Oakes)

Case reversed an enhancement for obstruction of justice because lower court failed to make required findings with respect to materiality, and instead relied on defendant's motivation, which the court said did not equate to materiality.

Out of the cacophony of the inventive list of multiple charges filed in this environmental ...

Thompson v. Souza, No. 96-55662 (9th Cir.) (111 F.3d 694) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)

QUOTE OF THE WEEK - One judicial view of the senseless cruelties inflicted on prisoners.

"There are different ways to look upon the inmates of prisons and jails in the United States in 1995. One way is to look upon them as members of a different species, indeed as a ...

U.S. v. Rouse, No. 95-1554 (8th Cir.) (111 F.3d 561) (April 11, 1997) (Judge James B. Loken)

Prior to trial, the government filed a motion to permit all child witnesses to testify by closed circuit TV. Although the district court denied that motion on a preliminary basis, at trial when the wttnesses were called the court reconsidered. In the words of the 8th Circuit: "Five-year- old J. ...

U.S. v. Amlani, No. 94-50292 (9th Cir.) (111 F.3d 705) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Charles E. Wiggins)

Thompson v. Souza, No. 96-55662 (9th Cir.) (111 F.3d 694) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)

It was just a normal night for the convicts; and one of those memorable decisions from the courts. At 11:30 p.m., 129 California inmates were roused from their beds so the guards could practice one of their shake-downs. "A prison guard videotaped the removal of some of the inmates from ...

U.S. v. Ramnath, No. CR-96-0012 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y.) (958 F.Supp. 99) (February 27, 1997) (Judge Charles P. Sifton)

While the court acknowledged that a departure based on § 5K1.1 requires the prosecution's consent, the Court held that "Section 5K1.1 does not, however, prevent a sentencing court from departing from the Guidelines due to other forms of assistance that a defendant may give. For example, . . . If ...

U.S. v. Brooks, No. 95-5728 (4th Cir.) (111 F.3d 365) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)

In this case of first impression, the Court acknowledged that its decision was at variance with what it called dictum in U.S. v. Nadi, 996 F.2d 548 (2nd Cir. 1993) where that court stated that for purposes of the jurisdictional requirements of § 1031(a) "the value of the contract is ...

Valente v. U.S., No. 96-2505 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 290) (July 14, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Court held that defendant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether his waiver of right to appeal was knowing and voluntary.

U.S. v. Amaya, No. 96-40572 (5th Cir.) (111 F.3d 386) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Robert M. Parker)

Justice Lummus of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts once observed: "If all the defendants should combine to refuse to plead guilty, and should dare to hold out, they could break down the administration of criminal justice in any state in the Union. . . . The truth is, that ...

U.S. v. Cooper, No. 96-6717 (11th Cir.) (111 F.3d 845) (May 5, 1997) (Judge John C. Godbold)

The issue in this case was whether the district court had erred by imposing a two-level sentence enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). The Eleventh Circuit ruled that the district court had erred; and it vacated the sentence enhancement.

The defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and with ...

U.S. v. Zagari, No. 96-1130, No. 599 (2nd Cir.) (111 F.3d 307) (April 17, 1997) (Judge James L. Oakes)

Court ruled that enhancement for "conscious or reckless risk of serious bodily injury" contained in USSG § 2F1.1(b)(4) could not be applied to crimes committed prior to enactment of Guideline Amendment 156.

Jensen v. County of Lake, No. H-74-230 (N.D.Ill.) (958 F.Supp. 397) (March 5, 1997) (Judge Rudy Lozano)

This is another of the growing number of cases that addresses the thorny issue of the constitutionality of one of the more controversial provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") - the provision that allows the 244 U.S. prison institutions in 34 jurisdictions in this country to seek early ...

U.S. v. Green, No. 96-2408 (7th Cir.) (111 F.3d 515) (April 14, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)

Here, citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975), the Seventh Circuit noted that the Supreme Court had set forth three factors for determining whether the cauusl chain had been sufficiently attenuated to disspiate the taint of the illegal conduct: (1) the time elapsed between the illegality and the acquisition ...

U.S. v. Coleman, No. 93-00011-05-CR-W-9-6 (W.D.Mo.) (958 F.Supp. 452) (March 27, 1997) (Judge Howard F. Sachs)

The defendant in this case was a mere 21 years old at the time of his sentencing; and he received a sentence of life imprisonment for an assortment of drug charges. After his sentencing, Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) which empowered the court to reduce a sentence if the ...

U.S. v. Ramnath, No. CR-96-0012 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y.) (958 F.Supp. 99) (February 27, 1997) (Judge Charles P. Sifton)

Here the Court granted a downward departure to an alien who consented to deportation, even though the Government objected due to the defendant's failure to plead guilty. The Court held that the principal basis for the reduction was not the defendant's acceptance of responsibility, but the substantial reduction in amount ...