Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: March 12, 2001

Issue PDF
Volume 8, Number 11

In this issue:

  1. Texas v. Cobb, No. 99-1702 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 162; 121 S.Ct. 1335) (April 2, 2001) (Justice Rehnquist) (p None)
  2. U.S. v. Flemmi, No. 00-1968 (1st Cir.) (245 F.3d 24) (March 30, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya) (p None)
  3. Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, No. 98-7307 (3rd Cir.) (239 F.3d 307) (January 29, 2001) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. Pratt, No. 99-4424 (4th Cir.) (239 F.3d 640) (February 7, 2001) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Diaz, No. 00-3168 (3rd Cir.) (245 F.3d 294) (March 30, 2001) (Judge Jane R. Roth) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Crawford, No. 99-50803 (9th Cir.) (239 F.3d 1086) (January 23, 2001) (Judge William Haskell Alsup) (p None)
  7. U.S. v. Huerta, No. 00-1940 (7th Cir.) (239 F.3d 865) (February 2, 2001) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple) (p None)
  8. U.S. v. Parolin, No. 00-1676 (7th Cir.) (239 F.3d 922) (February 12, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum) (p None)
  9. Levan v. U.S., No. Civ. 00-2146 (E.D.Pa.) (128 F.Supp.2d 270) (January 18, 2001) (Judge Franklin S. Van Antwerpen) (p None)

Texas v. Cobb, No. 99-1702 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 162; 121 S.Ct. 1335) (April 2, 2001) (Justice Rehnquist)

Proving once again that the rights of criminal defendants are often determined by word games played on slippery slopes, a sharply divided Supreme Court held last week that a criminal suspect’s constitutional right to have an attorney present during a custodial interrogation is “offense specific” and does not extend to ...

U.S. v. Flemmi, No. 00-1968 (1st Cir.) (245 F.3d 24) (March 30, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)

This decision is another chapter in the explosive, headline-grabbing saga that resulted from an “unholy alliance” between Stephen J. Flemmi and the FBI. Flemmi, who the First Circuit has described as “one of Boston’s most notorious gangsters,” served as a prized, secret and well-protected confidential informant of the FBI for ...

Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, No. 98-7307 (3rd Cir.) (239 F.3d 307) (January 29, 2001) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert)

As explained by the majority in this case: "The primary issue for decision is whether we should overrule the holding of Gibbs v. Roman, 116 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 1997), interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under this statute, popularly known as the "three strikes" rule, a prisoner may not file ...

U.S. v. Pratt, No. 99-4424 (4th Cir.) (239 F.3d 640) (February 7, 2001) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)

Here the Fourth Circuit held that there was no Apprendi error in imposing a five year term of supervised release on the defendant under 21 USC § 841(b)(1)(C), disagreeing with the 5th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. Meshack, 225 F.3d 556.

The Fifth Circuit had previously concluded that unless 21 ...

U.S. v. Diaz, No. 00-3168 (3rd Cir.) (245 F.3d 294) (March 30, 2001) (Judge Jane R. Roth)

This case is noted for its extended discussion of Guideline Amendment 591, which became effective on November 1, 2000, and which is significant because it changed the method of determining the proper Guideline section applicable to different crimes.

The defendant in this case operated a vocational school for aspiring beauticians; ...

U.S. v. Crawford, No. 99-50803 (9th Cir.) (239 F.3d 1086) (January 23, 2001) (Judge William Haskell Alsup)

U.S. v. Huerta, No. 00-1940 (7th Cir.) (239 F.3d 865) (February 2, 2001) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)

Here the Court held that under 7th Circuit precedent a trial judge is not required to submit the issue of drug quantity to the jury so long as the sentence imposed is not more severe than the statutory maximum for the offense imposed by the jury's verdict.

Among the many ...

U.S. v. Parolin, No. 00-1676 (7th Cir.) (239 F.3d 922) (February 12, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)

Levan v. U.S., No. Civ. 00-2146 (E.D.Pa.) (128 F.Supp.2d 270) (January 18, 2001) (Judge Franklin S. Van Antwerpen)

This decision is noted principally for its detailed review and analysis of whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) applies retroactively to initial habeas corpus petitions. Understandably, that is a topic that has flooded the prison rumor mills with false information - even ...