Skip navigation

Punch and Jurists: February 4, 2002

Issue PDF
Volume 9, Number 5

In this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Orso, No. 99-50328 (9th Cir.) (275 F.3d 1190) (December 28, 2001) (Per Curiam) (p None)
  2. U.S. v. Singleton, No. 00-0105(PLF) (D.D.C.) (177 F.Supp.2d 31) (December 4, 2001) (Judge Paul L. Friedman) (p None)
  3. U.S. v. Norris, No. 01-1347L (2nd Cir.) (281 F.3d 357) (February 19, 2002) (Judge Jon O. Newman) (p None)
  4. U.S. v. King, No. 01-1141 (2nd Cir.) (276 F.3d 109) (January 2, 2002) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin) (p None)
  5. U.S. v. Rodgers, No. 01-CR-37 (E.D.Wisc.) (186 F.Supp.2d 971) (February 8, 2002) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman) (p None)
  6. U.S. v. Mills, No. 98-CR-166 (E.D.Wisc.) (186 F.Supp.2d 965) (January 31, 2002) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman) (p None)
  7. U.S. v. Perkins, No. P-00-CR-270 (W.D.Tex.) (177 F.Supp.2d 570) (December 18, 2001) (Judge W. Royal Furgeson) (p None)
  8. U.S. v. Oliveros, No. 00-13390 (11th Cir.) (275 F.3d 1299) (December 17, 2001) (Judge Edward E. Carnes) (p None)
  9. U.S. v. 16328 South 43rd East Avenue, No. 00-5117 (10th Cir.) (275 F.3d 1281) (January 10, 2002) (Judge Deanell R. Tacha) (p None)
  10. U.S. v. Singleton, No. CRIM. 00-0105(PLF) (D.D.C.) (177 F.Supp.2d 12) (December 4, 2001) (Judge Paul L. Friedman) (p None)
  11. U.S. v. Bockius, No. CRIM.A.97-0250-01 (E.D.Pa.) (177 F.Supp.2d 353) (August 9, 2001) (Judge Herbert J. Hutton) (p None)
  12. U.S. v. Syme, No. 00-5172 (3rd Cir.) (276 F.3d 131) (January 7, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker) (p None)
  13. U.S. v. Nelson, No. Civ. No. 01-3264-KHV (D.Kan.) (177 F.Supp.2d 1181) (November 7, 2001) (Judge Kathryn H. Vratil) (p None)
  14. U.S. v. Swan, No. 01-1598 (3rd Cir.) (275 F.3d 272) (January 2, 2002) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell) (p None)

U.S. v. Orso, No. 99-50328 (9th Cir.) (275 F.3d 1190) (December 28, 2001) (Per Curiam)

United States v. Orso, 275 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2001) (En Banc) (Per Curiam)
United States v. Rodgers, No. 01-CR-37 (E.D.Wisc. 02/08/2002) (Judge Adelman)

Both of these cases dealt with some of the psychologically coercive tactics used by the police in obtaining confessions from suspects; and, while the confessions at …

U.S. v. Singleton, No. 00-0105(PLF) (D.D.C.) (177 F.Supp.2d 31) (December 4, 2001) (Judge Paul L. Friedman)

U.S. v. Norris, No. 01-1347L (2nd Cir.) (281 F.3d 357) (February 19, 2002) (Judge Jon O. Newman)

The Second Circuit has finally addressed the late Judge Nickerson’s two earlier Apprendi decisions in this case (reported at 128 F.Supp.2d 739 (E.D.N.Y. 2001) (P&J, 1/22/01) and 143 F.Supp.2d 243 (E.D.N.Y. 2001) (P&J, 4/23/01)), which caused great consternation in Government circles and led to claims of impending doom and disaster …

U.S. v. King, No. 01-1141 (2nd Cir.) (276 F.3d 109) (January 2, 2002) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)

In this case, Judge Sweet of the S.D.N.Y. had previously held that parts of the Child Support Recovery Act, as amended by the Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act, were unconstitutional in that they exceeded the scope of Congressional power under the Commerce Clause. Judge Sweet had relied extensively on the reasoning …

U.S. v. Rodgers, No. 01-CR-37 (E.D.Wisc.) (186 F.Supp.2d 971) (February 8, 2002) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)

United States v. Orso, 275 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2001) (En Banc) (Per Curiam)
United States v. Rodgers, 186 F.Supp.2d 971 (E.D.Wisc. Feb. 2, 2002) (Judge Adelman)

Both of these cases dealt with some of the psychologically coercive tactics used by the police in obtaining confessions from suspects; and, while …

U.S. v. Mills, No. 98-CR-166 (E.D.Wisc.) (186 F.Supp.2d 965) (January 31, 2002) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)

Here, Judge Adelman took issue with the Ninth Circuit and, in a text book example of statutory construction, held that halfway-house detention cannot lawfully be imposed as a condition of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d).

In this case, taking issue with a decision from the Ninth Circuit, Judge …

U.S. v. Perkins, No. P-00-CR-270 (W.D.Tex.) (177 F.Supp.2d 570) (December 18, 2001) (Judge W. Royal Furgeson)

We can just imagine the pressure that was exerted on Judge Furgeson in this case. In September, 2001, he committed major heresy not only by ruling that U.S. Border Patrol agents have limited authority and jurisdiction to make arrests and conduct searches under the drug laws, but also by directly …

U.S. v. Oliveros, No. 00-13390 (11th Cir.) (275 F.3d 1299) (December 17, 2001) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)

U.S. v. 16328 South 43rd East Avenue, No. 00-5117 (10th Cir.) (275 F.3d 1281) (January 10, 2002) (Judge Deanell R. Tacha)

U.S. v. Singleton, No. CRIM. 00-0105(PLF) (D.D.C.) (177 F.Supp.2d 12) (December 4, 2001) (Judge Paul L. Friedman)

U.S. v. Bockius, No. CRIM.A.97-0250-01 (E.D.Pa.) (177 F.Supp.2d 353) (August 9, 2001) (Judge Herbert J. Hutton)

The defendant in this case had previously been granted a downward departure when the district court, relying in the Third Circuit's decision in U.S. v. Smith, 186 F.3d 290 (3rd Cir. 1999), concluded that his conduct fell outside the "heartland" of the money laundering Guidelines. On appeal, that departure was …

U.S. v. Syme, No. 00-5172 (3rd Cir.) (276 F.3d 131) (January 7, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)

U.S. v. Nelson, No. Civ. No. 01-3264-KHV (D.Kan.) (177 F.Supp.2d 1181) (November 7, 2001) (Judge Kathryn H. Vratil)

U.S. v. Swan, No. 01-1598 (3rd Cir.) (275 F.3d 272) (January 2, 2002) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)

On an issue of first impression in the Third Circuit (but one which has divided the other Circuits) the court held that despite the “should” language Section 5G1.3(c) of the Sentencing Guidelines and the accompanying Application Note 6, the Guidelines do not mandate that a sentencing court impose consecutive sentences …