Skip navigation

Search

42 results
Article • May 26, 2009
Edwards v. Arizona, No. 79-5269 (U.S. Supreme Court) (451 U.S. 477; 101 S.Ct. 1880) (May 18, 1981) (Justice White) by In this case, the defendant was arrested at his home and taken to a police station where an officer informed him of his Miranda rights. The defendant asserted his right …
Article • May 26, 2009
Michigan v. Jackson, No. 84-1531 (U.S. Supreme Court) (475 U.S. 625; 106 S.Ct. 1404) (April 1, 1986) (Justice Stevens) by In Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 (1981), the Supreme Court held that an accused person in custody who has "expressed his desire to deal with the police only through …
Article • April 1, 2009 • from P&J May, 2009
Montejo v. Louisiana, No. 07-1529 (U.S. Supreme Court) (556 U.S. 778; 129 S.Ct. 2079) (May 26, 2009) (Justice Scalia) by In a ruling that epitomizes the Supreme Court’s current conservative-versus-liberal alignment of Justices, a 5-4 majority overruled the Court’s 23-year-old holding in Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986) and …
Article • November 1, 2008 • from P&J November, 2008
U.S. v. Robinson, No. 08-10424 (5th Cir.) (542 F.3d 1045) (September 10, 2008) (Judge Thomas M. Reavley) by Here the Fifth Circuit held that an inmate seeking a sentence reduction under the recent, retroactive crack-cocaine amendment to the Guidelines had a right to the appointment of counsel “in the interest …
Article • December 1, 2005 • from P&J December, 2005
U.S. v. Gonzalez-Lopez, No. 03-3487 (8th Cir.) (399 F.3d 924) (March 8, 2005) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye) by Defendant was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri of conspiring to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. On appeal, defendant argued …
Article • August 5, 2005
Gideon v. Wainwright, No. 155 (U.S. Supreme Court) (372 U.S. 335; 83 S.Ct. 792) (March 18, 2063) (Justice Black) by In this case, a unanimous Court held "that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be …
Article • April 26, 2004
U.S. v. Cronic, No. 82-660 (U.S. Supreme Court) (466 U.S. 648; 104 S.Ct. 2039) (May 14, 1984) (Justice Stevens) by This seminal case set the standard for determining when there has been a complete denial of a defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel, in which case there is a …
Article • June 9, 2002 • from P&J May, 2002
Cockrell v. Burdine, No. 01-495 (U.S. Supreme Court) (535 U.S. 1120; 122 S.Ct. 2347) (June 3, 2002) (Per Curiam) by Several times in the past few years we have commented on some of the prior appeals in this well-publicized capital case, which has become known in the press as the …
Article • May 21, 2002
Scott v. Illinois, No. 77-1177 (U.S. Supreme Court) (440 U.S. 367; 99 S.Ct. 1158) (March 5, 1979) (Justice Rehnquist) by Here the Court held that the 6th and 14th Amendments "require only that no indigent criminal defendant be sentenced to a term of imprisonment unless the State has afforded him …
Article • May 21, 2002
Argersinger v. Hamlin, No. 70-5015 (U.S. Supreme Court) (407 U.S. 25; 92 S.Ct. 2006) (June 12, 1972) (Justice Douglas) by Here the Court held that the right to counsel applies to any offense - misdemeanor or felony - for which a term of imprisonment is imposed; and that the right …
Article • May 1, 2002 • from P&J May, 2002
Bell v. Cone, No. 01-400 (U.S. Supreme Court) (535 U.S. 685; 122 S.Ct. 1843) (May 28, 2002) (Justice Rehnquist) by Here, by a vote of 8 to 1, the Court reversed the grant of habeas relief to a capital defendant whose counsel did nothing at his original hearing, principally on …
Article • April 1, 2002 • from P&J April, 2002
Alabama v. Shelton, No. 00-1214 (U.S. Supreme Court) (535 U.S. 654; 122 S.Ct. 1764) (May 20, 2002) (Justice Ginsburg) by Here a sharply divided Supreme Court held that an indigent defendant has a right to court appointed counsel even in misdemeanor cases that result in a suspended sentence - a …
Article • November 25, 2001
Geders v. U.S., No. 74-5968 (U.S. Supreme Court) (425 U.S. 80; 96 S.Ct. 1330) (March 30, 1976) (Justice Burger) by Here the Court held that a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when the trial court prohibited him from consulting with his counsel during a …
Article • October 1, 2001 • from P&J October, 2001
Green v. U.S., No. 00-2624 (8th Cir.) (262 F.3d 715) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold) by The petitioner in this case, Mack Green, sought to challenge his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. As part of that proceeding, he applied for in forma pauperis status. …
Article • August 1, 2001 • from P&J August, 2001
Mitchell v. Mason, No. 99-1839 (6th Cir.) (257 F.3d 554) (July 12, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore) by In this case, the habeas petitioner argued that he was entitled to a presumption of ineffective assistance of counsel where the record indicated that his trial counsel had consulted with him for …
Article • April 1, 2001 • from P&J April, 2001
Cone v. Bell, No. 99-5279 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 961) (March 22, 2001) (Judge James L. Ryan) by Here the Court granted habeas relief to the Petitioner after concluding that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in death penalty case under the Sixth Amendment where, at sentencing, his …
Article • September 4, 2000
U.S. v. Ash, No. 71-1255 (U.S. Supreme Court) (413 U.S. 300; 93 S.Ct. 2568) (June 21, 1973) (Justice Blackmun) by Here the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not grant an accused the right to have counsel present when the Government conducts a post-indictment photographic display for the purpose …
Article • July 2, 2000
Nichols v. U.S., No. 92-8556 (U.S. Supreme Court) (511 U.S. 738; 114 S.Ct. 1921) (June 6, 1994) (Justice Rehnquist) by In this case, after petitioner Nichols pleaded guilty to federal felony drug charges, he was assessed criminal history points under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, including one point for a …
Article • July 2, 2000
Baldasar v. Illinois, No. 77-6219 (U.S. Supreme Court) (446 U.S. 222; 100 S.Ct. 1585) (April 22, 1980) (Per Curiam) by Here a divided court held that the Constitution prohibits a sentencing court from considering a defendant's previous uncounseled misdemeanor conviction in sentencing him for a subsequent offense. One year after …
Article • June 23, 2000
Perry v. Leeke, No. 87-6325 (U.S. Supreme Court) (488 U.S. 272; 109 S.Ct. 594) (January 10, 1989) (Justice Stevens) by Here the Court held that a trial court's order directing that the defendant not consult with his counsel during a 15-minute recess in the trial was permissible, stating that: "The …
Page 1 of 3. | 1 2 3 | Next »