Skip navigation

Search

21 results
Article • March 12, 2018 • from P&J March, 2018
Marinello v. U.S., No. 16-1144 (U.S. Supreme Court) (583 U.S. ___; 138 S.Ct. 1101) (March 21, 2018) (Justice Breyer) by Carlo J. Marinello II was convicted of eight counts of tax evasion and one count of violating a provision of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), 26 U.S.C. §7212(a). That provision …
Article • April 18, 2011
Cheek v. U.S., No. 89-658 (U.S. Supreme Court) (498 U.S. 192; 111 S.Ct. 604) (January 8, 1991) (Justice White) by In this case the defendant, an airline pilot, claimed he was exempt from federal taxes and sought a complete refund of withheld taxes. He was charged with violating two provisions …
Article • December 1, 2010
U.S. v. Davis, No. 09-3626-cr (2nd Cir.) (624 F.3d 508) (November 5, 2010) (Judge Jon O. Newman) by Defendant's conviction for sexual exploitation of a minor is affirmed where the knowledge of interstate transmission of a visual depiction of a minor, induced to engage in explicit sexual conduct, under 18 …
Article • May 1, 2009 • from P&J June, 2009
U.S. v. Abdulle, No. 06-3647-cr (2nd Cir.) (564 F.3d 119) (April 22, 2009) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor) by Conviction for drug crimes is affirmed where the evidence was sufficient to show both that defendant knew that cathinone was a controlled substance and that he conspired to possess and distribute that specific …
Article • December 1, 2008 • from P&J December, 2008
U.S. v. Hawkins, No. 07-3018-cr (2nd Cir.) (547 F.3d 66) (October 16, 2008) (Judge Chester J. Straub) by Judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict for a cocaine-distribution conspiracy is reversed and remanded where there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's determination that the defendant not only had a buyer-seller …
Article • May 1, 2007 • from P&J May, 2007
U.S. v. Heredia, No. 03-10585 (9th Cir.) (483 F.3d 913) (April 30, 2007) (Judge Alex Kozinski) by The question whether one can “knowingly” possess drugs without having actual knowledge of it has always vexed defense counsel - and has even confused the courts. More than 30 years ago, the Ninth …
Article • March 1, 2007 • from P&J March, 2007
U.S. v. Heredia, No. 03-10585 (9th Cir.) (481 F.3d 1188) (April 2, 2007) (Judge Alex Kozinski) by The question whether one can “knowingly” possess drugs without having actual knowledge of it has always vexed defense counsel - and has even confused the courts. More than 30 years ago, the Ninth …
Article • December 1, 2005 • from P&J December, 2005
U.S. v. Heredia, No. 03-10585 (9th Cir.) (429 F.3d 820) (October 24, 2005) (Judge Jay S. Bybee) by Amending and supplementing decision previously reported at 426 F.3d 1226 (9th Cir. Oct. 24, 2005); but this decision was subsequently reversed by an en banc decision reported at 481 F.3d 1188 (9th …
Article • October 1, 2005 • from P&J October, 2005
U.S. v. Heredia, No. 03-10585 (9th Cir.) (426 F.3d 1226) (October 24, 2005) (Judge Jay S. Bybee) by U.S. v. Truong, 425 F.3d 1282 (10th Cir. Oct. 17, 2005) (Judge McConnell) U.S. v. Heredia, 426 F.3d 1226 (9th Cir. Oct. 24, 2005) (Judge Bybee) In these two drug cases, the …
Article • September 12, 2002
Lambert v. California, No. 47 (U.S. Supreme Court) (355 U.S. 225; 78 S.Ct. 240) (December 16, 2057) (Justice Douglas) by In this case, the Court applied a narrow exception to the general maxim "ignorance of the law is no excuse." Here, the Court considered the requirements for conviction of a …
Article • November 1, 2000 • from P&J November, 2000
U.S. v. Finkelstein, No. 99-1565 (2nd Cir.) (229 F.3d 90) (October 2, 2000) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse) by Here the Court held that evidence of a defendant’s conscious avoidance of knowledge that funds underlying a money laundering conviction were proceeds of illegal narcotics activity could be considered in applying a …
Article • September 14, 2000
U.S. v. Freed, No. 345 (U.S. Supreme Court) (401 U.S. 601; 91 S.Ct. 1112) (April 5, 1971) (Justice Douglas) by Here the Court rejected application of one of the limited exceptions to the rule that ignorance of the law may be a defense (as established in Lambert v. California, 355 …
Article • September 12, 2000
Bryan v. U.S., No. 96-8422 (U.S. Supreme Court) (524 U.S. 184; 118 S.Ct. 1939) (June 15, 1998) (Justice Stevens) by This is another of a recent series of cases to explore whether ignorance of the law can be an excuse from criminal liability - a concept explored at some length …
Article • August 1, 2000 • from P&J August, 2000
U.S. v. Hutzell, No. 99-3719 (8th Cir.) (217 F.3d 966) (July 5, 2000) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold) by One of the more controversial statutes that Congress has enacted in recent years was 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) which makes it unlawful for any person who has been convicted in any court …
Article • June 1, 1999 • from P&J June, 1999
U.S. v. Wallace, No. 98 CR 681(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (40 F.Supp.2d 131) (March 15, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by In addition to setting forth in full the jury instructions that were approved in this case, the Court also noted that: "This is nearly a perfect example of a case where …
Article • December 22, 1998
Ratzlaf v. U.S., No. 92-1196 (U.S. Supreme Court) (510 U.S. 135; 114 S.Ct. 655) (January 11, 1994) (Justice Ginsburg) by As in the case of Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991), the court carved out an exception to the general rule that every person is presumed to know …
Article • December 1, 1998 • from P&J December, 1998
U.S. v. Wilson, No. 98-1256 (7th Cir.) (159 F.3d 280) (October 16, 1998) (Judge William J. Bauer) by In this case, the defendant was convicted of possessing a gun while subject to a protective order, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8). That statute makes it a crime for any …
Article • December 1, 1998 • from P&J December, 1998
U.S. v. Wilson, No. 98-1256 (7th Cir.) (159 F.3d 280) (October 16, 1998) (Judge William J. Bauer) by Quote from Judge Posner in which he argued that the general rule that ignorance of the law is no excuse should not apply to statutes that are unduly complex or obscure. QUOTE …
Article • July 1, 1997 • from P&J July, 1997
U.S. v. Pipkin, No. 96-20402 (5th Cir.) (114 F.3d 528) (June 2, 1997) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss) by After observing that the Secretary of Treasury had withdrawn a regulation that would have required banks to post notices of the changes in law in bank tellers windows, Government could not …
Article • November 1, 1996 • from P&J November, 1996
U.S. v. Ismail, No. 95-5299 (4th Cir.) (97 F.3d 50) (September 26, 1996) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz) by Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Ratzlaf v. U.S., 510 U.S. 135, the Fourth Circuit vacated a money structuring conviction on the ground that the Government had failed to prove the …
Page 1 of 2. | 1 2 | Next »