Skip navigation

Search

352 results
Page 11 of 18. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | Next »

Article • February 1, 1998 • from P&J February, 1998
U.S. v. Bozza, No. 96-9293 (11th Cir.) (132 F.3d 659) (January 8, 1998) (Judge Joseph Woodrow Hatchett) by This case deals with the notification provisions of U.S.S.G. § 2J1.7, which requires the sentencing court to give the defendant “sufficient notice” before the court may enhance the defendant’s sentence for a …
Article • February 1, 1998 • from P&J February, 1998
U.S. v. Smith, No. 96-6377 (10th Cir.) (131 F.3d 1392) (December 15, 1997) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly) by Here the Court approved a § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon that were found at the defendant's lab where he worked and residence because the court found they …
Article • February 1, 1998 • from P&J February, 1998
U.S. v. Foster, No. 89-10405 (9th Cir.) (133 F.3d 704) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Alex Kozinski) by As a prelude to this case, it should be noted that, by 1991, there were more than 100 separate Federal mandatory minimum statutes (see, U.S. v. Spencer, 25 F.3d 1105, 1112 (D.C.Cir. 1994)). …
Article • February 1, 1998 • from P&J February, 1998
U.S. v. Bolden, No. 96-3274 (10th Cir.) (132 F.3d 1353) (December 30, 1997) (Judge Michael R. Murphy) by Although the provisions of U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(C), provides for a sentence enhancement “if a firearm was brandished, displayed or possessed, the Court held that the Government wasn't really required to prove such …
Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998
U.S. v. Noah, No. 97-1403 (1st Cir.) (130 F.3d 490) (December 2, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya) by Court held that special skill enhancment does not require either formal training or professional stature; and that enhancement does not hinge on the complexity of the task to be performed.
Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998
U.S. v. Kuku, No. 95-9552 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1435) (December 2, 1997) (Per Curiam) by In a case involving counterfeit identification cards, the Court ruled that the district court erred by using § 2F1.1 rather than § 2L2.1 to calculate the defendant's sentence.
Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998
U.S. v. Barakat, No. 96-5013 (11th Cir.) (130 F.3d 1448) (December 15, 1997) (Judge Edward E. Carnes) by In this case, the Eleventh Circuit held the Eleventh Circuit held that an enhancement for the abuse of the position of trust could be justified only if the abuse was connected to …
Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998
U.S. v. Knobloch, No. 96-3022 (3rd Cir.) (131 F.3d 366) (December 10, 1997) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton) by In this case, the defendant Knobloch pled guilty to three counts charging him with conspiracy to distribute marijuana, distribution of anabolic steroids to an individual named Davis, and using and carrying a …
Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998
U.S. v. Bapack, No. 96-3172 (D.C. Cir.) (129 F.3d 1320) (December 5, 1997) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson) by Court held no error in applying sentencing enhancements both for managerial role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) and for more than minimal planning under § 2F1.1(b)(2)(A).
Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998
U.S. v. Sidhu, No. 96-50736 (5th Cir.) (130 F.3d 644) (December 3, 1997) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss) by Here the Court approved a § 3B1.3 enhancement on top of a § 3B1.2 enhancement, stating it was not "solely" because of his position as a physician. This Guideline specifically states …
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Lampley, No. 96-7074 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 1231) (October 20, 1997) (Judge Monroe G. McKay) by One of the issues raised in this case was whether the defendants could properly be convicted of a gun charge under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), for "using" or "carrying" a weapon "during …
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin) by In reversing an upward departure based upon a combination of "more than minimal planning" and "scheme to defraud more than one victim", the Court stated that "it is the rare case that …
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Cardoza, No. 96-1470 (1st Cir.) (129 F.3d 6) (October 27, 1997) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes) by United States v. Williams, 128 F.3d 1128 (7th Cir. 1997) (Judge Kanne) United States v. Cardoza, 129 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 1997) (Judge Bownes) Here are two more cases that show the …
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Torres-Echevarria, No. 97-1116 (2nd Cir.) (129 F.3d 692) (November 3, 1997) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs) by Court rejected claim that aggravated felony conviction under § 2L1.2 was double counting to criminal hostory points added under § 4A1.2.
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin) by Case held that a combination of "more than minimal planning" and "scheme to defraud more than one victim" did not warrant and upward departure.
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Padilla-Pena, No. 97-1297 (8th Cir.) (129 F.3d 457) (November 6, 1997) (Judge John R. Gibson) by Here the Court held that a downward adjustment for minimal participation should be "used infrequently" and is "appropriate, for example, for someone who played no other role in a very large drug …
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Smith, No. 96-9097 (11th Cir.) (127 F.3d 1388) (November 17, 1997) (Judge Joel F. Dubina) by Case upheld sentencing enhancement for use of guns during drug offense (even though defendant argued that gun was not in his possession at time of drug crime) based on relevant conduct. This …
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Wells, No. 93-3924 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 739) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Michael J. Melloy) by The Court noted that "more than minimal planning 'is deemed present in any case involving repeated acts over a period of time, unless it is clear that each instance was purely opportune'." …
Article • December 1, 1997 • from P&J December, 1997
U.S. v. Harris, No. 96-4539 (4th Cir.) (128 F.3d 850) (October 29, 1997) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson) by Use of gun enhancement under U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.1(b)(1) does not require proof of precisely concurrent acts.
Article • November 1, 1997 • from P&J November, 1997
U.S. v. Calozza, No. 95-30393 (9th Cir.) (125 F.3d 687) (August 25, 1997) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld) by Judge Brewster's dissent argues that there was impermissible double counting through the use of both the vulnerable victim and abuse of trust adjustments.
Page 11 of 18. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | Next »