Skip navigation

Search

34 results
Page 2 of 2. « Previous | 1 2 |

Article • July 1, 2002 • from P&J July, 2002
Wolf v. Ashcroft, No. 01-1869 (3rd Cir.) (297 F.3d 305) (July 24, 2002) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell) by In this case, plaintiffs, a class of inmates at FCI-McKean, sued various government and prison officials challenging a prison policy that banned the viewing of movies rated R, X, or NC-17 and …
Article • February 4, 2002 • from P&J April, 2001
Shaw v. Murphy, No. 99-1613 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 223; 121 S.Ct. 1475) (April 18, 2001) (Justice Thomas) by In this case, the Court held that prison inmates do not have any freestanding constitutional right to assist other inmates in filing legal claims. Starting from the premise that “it …
Article • January 1, 2001 • from P&J January, 2001
Treesh v. Taft, No. C-2-99-624 (S.D.Ohio) (122 F.Supp.2d 887) (November 16, 2000) (Judge Joseph P. Kinneary) by Our final case for this week deals with one of those senseless “believe-it-or-not” prison regulations that shows anti-prisoner venom run amok. Judge Kinneary’s summary of the issues involved in this case says it …
Article • June 18, 2000
Pell v. Procunier, No. 73-918 (U.S. Supreme Court) (417 U.S. 817; 94 S.Ct. 2800) (June 24, 1974) (Justice Stewart) by In this case, the regulation challenged "clearly restricts one manner of communication between prison inmates and members of the general public beyond the prison walls." In analyzing that regulation, the …
Article • December 1, 1999 • from P&J December, 1999
Murphy v. Shaw, No. 97-35989 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1121) (November 4, 1999) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher) by In this case the plaintiff, who had been trained as an inmate law clerk by his prison, was punished for sending a letter giving legal advice to another inmate who had been …
Article • December 1, 1999 • from P&J December, 1999
A.C.L.U. v. Reno, No. 98-5591 (E.D.Pa.) (31 F.Supp.2d 473) (February 1, 1999) (Judge Lowell A. Jr. Reed) by
Article • July 25, 1999
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, No. 76-316 (U.S. Supreme Court) (433 U.S. 350; 97 S.Ct. 2691) (June 27, 1977) (Justice Blackmun) by Case noted that "Frist Amendment rights are fragile interests, and a person who contemplates protected activity might be discouraged by the in terrorem effect of the statute.". …
Article • November 1, 1998 • from P&J November, 1998
Amatel v. Reno, No. 97-5293 (D.C. Cir.) (156 F.3d 192) (September 15, 1998) (Judge Stephen F. Williams) by Quotation from Judge Weld's dissenting opinion in which she strongly disagreed that the majority had shown any reasonable relationship between pornography and rehabilitation that would justify regulations banning publications like Playboy in …
Article • October 1, 1998 • from P&J October, 1998
Campbell v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction, No. 98-1161 (8th Cir.) (155 F.3d 950) (August 28, 1998) (Judge Diana E. Murphy) by This is one of those sadly amusing cases in which a prison warden sued the Arkansas Department of Corrections and several of its officers for damages - and won. …
Article • November 1, 1997 • from P&J November, 1997
Amatel v. Reno, No. Civil Action No. 96-2774(SS) (D.D.C.) (975 F.Supp. 365) (August 12, 1997) (Judge Stanley Sporkin) by This is a significant prison litigation case in which the court invalidated - as "facially violative of the First Amendment" - a recent, little noticed statute that permits the Federal Bureau …
Article • September 1, 1997 • from P&J September, 1997
Warner v. Orange County Dept. of Probation, No. 93 Civ. 1544 (GLG) (S.D.N.Y.) (968 F.Supp. 917) (June 27, 1997) (Judge Gerard L. Goettel) by The Court also held that the prevuious failure of the defendant to object to or appeal from the imposition of the special condition requiring him to …
Article • December 1, 1996 • from P&J December, 1996
Shimer v. Washington, No. 94-2063 (7th Cir.) (100 F.3d 506) (November 12, 1996) (Judge Joel L. Flaum) by Case held that there were substantial questions of fact whether a prison policy, prohibiting direct communications with Clemency Board, served any legitimate penological interests.
Article • January 1, 1994
Warner v. Orange County Dept. of Probation, No. 93 Cov. 1544 (GLG) (S.D.N.Y.) (870 F.Supp. 69) (December 14, 1994) (Judge Gerard L. Goettel) by Case held that motorist, who had been convicted of an alcohol-related driving offense, was entitled to bring a civil rights action against probation office for requiring …
Article • January 1, 1994
McCormick v. Peterson, No. CV93-2157 (E.D.N.Y.) (1993 WL 566334) (December 1, 1993) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by It is not surprising that this brief decision was never published - and is therefore generally unavailable as a precedent in most courts. A taxpayer filed his tax return by signing it "under …
Page 2 of 2. « Previous | 1 2 |