Article
•
August 1, 1998
•
from P&J August, 1998
U.S. v. Rapal, No. 97-10287 (9th Cir.) (146 F.3d 661) (June 1, 1998) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer) by This is a rare case in which the court held that a second sentence imposed after a prior remand was vindictive, and affirmed that vindictiveness can play no part in resentencing after …