Skip navigation

Search

94 results
Page 4 of 5. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next »

Article • July 1, 1998 • from P&J July, 1998
Singh v. Prunty, No. 96-56726 (9th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1157) (April 27, 1998) (Judge Donald P. Lay) by Case held that the knowing and deliberate suppression of the evidence of benefits received by an informant violated the Brady rule and constituted severe prejudice that warranted granting a writ of habeas …
Article • April 1, 1998 • from P&J April, 1998
U.S. v. Avellino, No. 97-1117, No. 309 (2nd Cir.) (136 F.3d 249) (January 30, 1998) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse) by This is one of those typical, inconsistent Brady-rule violation cases (see, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)) that tests the creative ingenuity of the courts. Of course, the decision …
Article • April 1, 1998 • from P&J April, 1998
U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 94-4021 (11th Cir.) (136 F.3d 1434) (March 17, 1998) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch) by The central issue in this explosive appeal was whether the Government had withheld critical material information of which it was aware that would "point the finger" at CIA participation in the …
Article • February 1, 1998 • from P&J February, 1998
U.S. v. Marshall, No. 96-3053 (D.C. Cir.) (132 F.3d 63) (January 6, 1998) (Judge David B. Sentelle) by
Article • November 1, 1997 • from P&J November, 1997
U.S. v. Vozzella, No. 95-1502, No. 926 (2nd Cir.) (124 F.3d 389) (August 29, 1997) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter) by
Article • November 1, 1997 • from P&J November, 1997
Clemmons v. Delo, No. 96-1086 (8th Cir.) (124 F.3d 944) (August 28, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold) by Conviction reversed because of prosecutorial misconduct arising from violation of Brady-type exculpatory evidence.
Article • November 1, 1997 • from P&J November, 1997
U.S. v. Vozzella, No. 95-1502, No. 926 (2nd Cir.) (124 F.3d 389) (August 29, 1997) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter) by United States v. Vozzella, 124 F.3d 389 (2nd Cir. 1997) (Judge Winter) Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944 (8th Cir. 1997) (Judge Arnold) In this rare double header, convictions …
Article • November 1, 1997 • from P&J November, 1997
Clemmons v. Delo, No. 96-1086 (8th Cir.) (124 F.3d 944) (August 28, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold) by United States v. Vozzella, 124 F.3d 389 (2nd Cir. 1997) (Judge Winter) Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944 (8th Cir. 1997) (Judge Arnold) In this rare double header, convictions from two Circuits …
Article • August 1, 1997 • from P&J August, 1997
U.S. v. Lasky, No. CR 97-127 (ADS) (E.D.N.Y.) (967 F.Supp. 749) (June 10, 1997) (Judge Arthur D. Spatt) by United States v. Murgas, 967 F.Supp. 695 (N.D.N.Y. 1997) United States v. Lasky, 967 F.Supp. 749 (E.D.N.Y. 1997) Among the many issues reviewed in these two cases are questions about when, …
Article • August 1, 1997 • from P&J August, 1997
U.S. v. Murgas, No. 95-CR-384 (HGM) (N.D.N.Y.) (967 F.Supp. 695) (April 15, 1997) (Judge Howard G. Munson) by United States v. Murgas, 967 F.Supp. 695 (N.D.N.Y. 1997) United States v. Lasky, 967 F.Supp. 749 (E.D.N.Y. 1997) Among the many issues reviewed in these two cases are questions about when, and …
Article • August 1, 1997 • from P&J August, 1997
U.S. v. Noriega, No. 92-4687 (11th Cir.) (117 F.3d 1206) (July 7, 1997) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch) by The Court observed that "Evidence regarding the bribing of a witness, although disturbing, clearly does not constitute impeachment material, and therefore Noriega cannot satisfy the [U.S. v. Garcia, 13 F.3d 1464 (11th …
Article • July 1, 1997 • from P&J July, 1997
U.S. v. Miller, No. 95-1077(L), No. 343 (2nd Cir.) (116 F.3d 641) (June 20, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse) by Court held that the late disclosure of evidence by the Government did not warrant suppression due to the failure of the defendant to prove prejudice.
Article • June 1, 1997 • from P&J June, 1997
U.S. v. Beckford, No. 3:96CR66-01 (E.D.Va.) (962 F.Supp. 780) (April 4, 1997) (Judge Robert E. Payne) by Of the four separate decisions reported in this case, this case was the most interesting because of its lengthy discussion of the Government's disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), …
Article • May 1, 1997 • from P&J May, 1997
U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 95-1438(L), No. 482 (2nd Cir.) (110 F.3d 936) (April 14, 1997) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker) by While this case does not directly refer to Rule 33, one of the issues raised was the claim made after trial that the defendants were entitled to a new …
Article • May 1, 1997 • from P&J May, 1997
U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 95-1438(L), No. 482 (2nd Cir.) (110 F.3d 936) (April 14, 1997) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker) by Here the Court rejected a claim that irrelevant evidence had been admitted, holding that to be relevant the evidence needs only to "tend" to prove the Government's case and …
Article • May 1, 1997 • from P&J May, 1997
Orena v. U.S., No. 96 CV 1474 (E.D.N.Y.) (956 F.Supp. 1071) (March 10, 1997) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by This case, which involves the activities of FBI agent Devecchio, is noted for its review of the Government's disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland and for its description of that happens …
Article • April 1, 1997 • from P&J April, 1997
U.S. v. McVeigh, No. 96-CR-68-M (D.Colo.) (954 F.Supp. 1441) (January 28, 1997) (Judge Richard P. Matsch) by United States v. Viltrakis, 108 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1997) (Judge Roney) United States v. McVeigh, 954 F.Supp. 1441 (D.Colo. 1997) (Judge Matsch) These two cases address another recurrent and fulminic issue: Does …
Article • April 1, 1997 • from P&J April, 1997
Jean v. Collins, No. 95-7694 (4th Cir.) (107 F.3d 1111) (March 7, 1997) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin) by
Article • March 1, 1997 • from P&J March, 1997
U.S. v. Pelullo, No. 95-1829 (3rd Cir.) (105 F.3d 117) (January 9, 1997) (Judge Timothy K. Lewis) by For nearly a decade Leonard Pelullo has fought a lonely battle trying to disprove the constantly refiled charges that he engaged in a series of illegal schemes with the dreaded Mafia in …
Article • November 1, 1996 • from P&J November, 1996
U.S. v. Sotelo, No. 95-10755 (5th Cir.) (97 F.3d 782) (October 8, 1996) (Judge Robert M. Parker) by One of the issues raised in this case was a claim that the Government withheld important information about one of its star witnesses until after the trial was over, in violation of …
Page 4 of 5. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next »