Skip navigation

Search

71 results
Page 4 of 4. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 |

Article • September 1, 1995
U.S. v. Allender, No. 94-3200 (7th Cir.) (62 F.3d 909) (August 4, 1995) (Judge Daniel A. Manion) by Here the Court explained that Application Note 7 (now Application Note 8(b)) refers to the speculative "opportunity cost" of misappropriated funds. "It does not refer to a guaranteed specific rate of return …
Article • August 1, 1995
U.S. v. Wright, No. 94-5644 (6th Cir.) (60 F.3d 240) (July 27, 1995) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt) by In this case the defendant pled guilty to making false statements in order to obtain three bank loans. The defendant was sentenced on the basis of some $173,000 in "losses" even though …
Article • August 1, 1995
U.S. v. Karterman, No. 93-30408 (9th Cir.) (60 F.3d 576) (July 13, 1995) (Judge Charles E. Wiggins) by Section 2T1.3 of the Guidelines permits a two level enhancement if unreported income of over $10,000 comes from "criminal activity". Here, the Ninth Circuit rules that conduct which does not lead to …
Article • August 1, 1995
U.S. v. Asher, No. 95-1013 (7th Cir.) (59 F.3d 622) (June 28, 1995) (Judge Jesse E. Eschbach) by Court held that the amount of loss in a check kiting scheme is the amount of loss at the time the scheme was discovered. This case involved a check kiting scheme in …
Article • August 1, 1995
U.S. v. Ledesma, No. 93-4316 (11th Cir.) (60 F.3d 750) (August 4, 1995) (Judge R. Lanier III Anderson) by Case held that restitution cannot be ordered for losses arising out of a separate crime for which the defendant was not convicted. Here's an interesting restitution case where the defendant pled …
Article • July 1, 1995
U.S. v. Flowers, No. 94-5806 (6th Cir.) (55 F.3d 218) (May 26, 1995) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder) by In this case, the Sixth Circuit joins the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 7th Circuits in holding that the amount of loss for sentencing purposes under § 2F1.1 is the actual amount at …
Article • January 1, 1994
U.S. v. Haddock, No. 93-3034 (10th Cir.) (12 F.3d 950) (December 13, 1993) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson) by The Court held that the sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 are "only for loss to the victims, not for gain to the defendants. The defendant's gain may be used only as …
Article • January 1, 1994
U.S. v. Jewett, No. 91-1769 (6th Cir.) (978 F.2d 248) (October 26, 1992) (Judge James L. Ryan) by In this post-Hughey [v. U.S., 495 U.S. 411 (1990)] decision, the Court held that the amended provisions of the VWPA have redefined the conduct relevant to an award of restitution and permits …
Article • January 1, 1994
U.S. v. Hoyle, No. 93-5359 (4th Cir.) (33 F.3d 415) (September 1, 1994) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin) by Case held that fact that interest could not be included in determination of loss under Guidelines did not preclude it from being included in award of restitution, in sentencing defendant for …
Article • January 1, 1994
U.S. v. Kopp, No. 91-5453 (3rd Cir.) (951 F.2d 521) (December 4, 1991) (Judge Edward R. Becker) by Here the Court rejected the defendant's contention that because he borrowed $13.75 million from a bank, that should be the measure of loss; holding that fraud loss should be based on the …
Article • January 1, 1994
U.S. v. Hoyle, No. 93-5359 (4th Cir.) (33 F.3d 415) (September 1, 1994) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin) by The Court stated: "The district court relied on the calculations in the Presentence Report, which expressly stated that interest was included. The court sentenced Benton pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 for …
Page 4 of 4. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 |