Article
•
June 1, 1999
•
from P&J June, 1999
U.S. v. Marolf, No. 97-56275 (9th Cir.) (173 F.3d 1213) (April 12, 1999) (Judge Philip M. Pro) by After agreeing that the Government's forfeiture was void for lack of adequate notice, the Court held that the district court must grant the claimant's Rule 41(e) motion without a hearing on the …