Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Truman, No. 01-5072 (6th Cir.) (304 F.3d 586) (August 29, 2002) (Judge David M. Lawson) by This is an important Guidelines’ decision that will probably ignite an immediate debate about the scope of U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 - and set off a flurry of a whole range of new …

In Re Sealed Case, No. 97-3104 (D.C. Cir.) (204 F.3d 1170) (March 14, 2000) (Judge Judith W. Rogers) by In this case, the defendant failed to object at sentencing when the district court refused to grant him a downward departure for substantial assistance (under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1) based on assistance …

U.S. v. Kaye, No. 94-1381 (2nd Cir.) (140 F.3d 86) (March 16, 1998) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter) by United States v. Campo, 140 F.3d 415 (2nd. Cir. 1998) (Per Curiam) United States v. Kaye, 140 F.3d 86 (2nd Cir. 1998) (Judge Winter) Both of these cases are significant because …

U.S. v. Kaye, No. 94-1381, 899 (2nd Cir.) (65 F.3d 240) (September 5, 1995) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter) by In this case the Government refused to file a § 5K1.1 motion, apparently because the defedant's cooperation with Federal authorities failed to produce a Federal prosecution and because the defendant …