Skip navigation

Search

3 results
Article • May 1, 1998 • from P&J May, 1998
U.S. v. Smith, No. CRIM. A. 94-524 (D.N.J.) (992 F.Supp. 743) (February 4, 1998) (Judge Nicholas H. Politan) by The fur really flew in this case; and the battle is still not over. The setting for this decision was a motion by two defendants, an intervening corporation and an intervening …
Article • January 1, 1996 • from P&J January, 1996
U.S. v. Forman, No. 94-1731 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 1214) (December 21, 1995) (Judge James L. Ryan) by Court held that because the defendant, a former prosecutor, had not been assigned to work on a case, he could not be convicted of violating Rule 6(e)(2) and its secrecy mandates. Guess …
Article • January 1, 1996 • from P&J January, 1996
U.S. v. Forman, No. 94-1731 (6th Cir.) (71 F.3d 1214) (December 21, 1995) (Judge James L. Ryan) by Court held that because the defendant, a former prosecutor, had not been assigned to work on a case, he could not be convicted of violating Rule 6(e)(2) and its secrecy mandates.