Article
•
March 1, 2007
•
from P&J March, 2007
U.S. v. Watson, No. 04-3082 (D.C. Cir.) (483 F.3d 828) (April 13, 2007) (Judge Judith W. Rogers) by The principal question in this appeal was whether a prosecutor's peremptory challenge of two visually impaired jurors was lawful under the rule of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). Under the …