Skip navigation

Search

36 results
Article • July 28, 2014 • from P&J July, 2014
U.S. v. Flores-Mejia, No. 12-3149 (3rd Cir.) (759 F.3d 253) (July 16, 2014) (Judge Jane R. Roth) by Overruling its decision in U.S. v. Sevilla, 541 F.3d 226 (3d Cir. Sept. 4, 2008), a divided Third Circuit, sitting en banc, held that a procedural error at sentencing is preserved only …
Article • June 10, 2013 • from P&J June, 2013
McQuiggan v. Perkins, No. 12-126 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 383; 133 S.Ct. 1924) (May 28, 2013) (Justice Ginsburg) by McQuiggan v. Perkins, No. 12-126 (U.S. Sup. Ct. May 28, 2013) (Justice Ginsburg) Trevino v. Thaler, No. 11-10189 (U.S. Sup. Ct. May 28, 2013) (Justice Breyer) In these two habeas …
Article • March 27, 2012
Coleman v. Thompson, No. 89-7662 (U.S. Supreme Court) (501 U.S. 722; 111 S.Ct. 2546) (June 24, 1991) (Justice O'Connor) by In this detailed review of the relatonship between procedural defaults and federal habeas review, the Court held that inter alia a state prisoner's federal habeas petition should be dismissed if …
Article • December 1, 2011
U.S. v. Thorn, No. 11-37-cr (L) (2nd Cir.) (659 F.3d 227) (October 20, 2011) (Judge Reena Raggi) by In cross-appeals from a judgment of the district court vacating a money laundering conspiracy conviction in light of US v. Santos, judgment is reversed where defendant's challenge to the "proceeds" element of …
Article • March 1, 2009 • from P&J April, 2009
Cone v. Bell, No. 07-1114 (U.S. Supreme Court) (556 U.S. 449; 129 S.Ct. 1769) (April 28, 2009) (Justice Stevens) by To best understand the issues before the Supreme Court in this capital sentencing case, one should start with Justice Stevens’ concluding paragraph where he observed: “In the 27 years since …
Article • June 15, 2006
Herrera v. Collins, No. 91-7328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (506 U.S. 390; 113 S.Ct. 853) (January 25, 1993) (Justice Rehnquist) by Ten years after his conviction of capital murder, and quite some years after having exhausted his state and federal, direct and collateral appeals, the petitioner in this case, Leonel Torres …
Article • June 15, 2006
Sawyer v. Whitley, No. 91-6382 (U.S. Supreme Court) (505 U.S. 333; 112 S.Ct. 2514) (June 22, 1992) (Justice Rehnquist) by In this case, the issue addressed by the Court was the proper the standard for determining whether a petitioner bringing a successive, abusive, or defaulted federal habeas claim has shown …
Article • May 1, 2006 • from P&J May, 2006
House v. Bell, No. 04-8990 (U.S. Supreme Court) (547 U.S. 518; 126 S.Ct. 2064) (June 12, 2006) (Justice Kennedy) by Here the Court addressed for the first time the impact of DNA evidence on habeas cases holding that a death row inmate has made a sufficient showing on his claim …
Article • June 1, 2005 • from P&J June, 2005
Rompilla v. Beard, No. 04-5462 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 374; 125 S.Ct. 2456) (June 20, 2005) (Justice Souter) by Here the Court held, by a 5-to-4 vote, that even when a capital defendant himself has suggested that no mitigating evidence is available, his lawyer is bound to make reasonable …
Article • April 1, 2004 • from P&J April, 2004
Dretke v. Haley, No. 02-1824 (U.S. Supreme Court) (541 U.S. 386; 124 S.Ct. 1847) (May 3, 2004) (Justice O'Connor) by Here, by a 6 to 3 vote, in a case where the defendant was incorrectly sentenced as a habitual offender, the Court declined to correct the forfeited error because to …
Article • February 1, 2004 • from P&J February, 2004
Baldwin v. Reese, No. 02-964 (U.S. Supreme Court) (541 U.S. 27; 124 S.Ct. 1347) (March 2, 2004) (Justice Breyer) by In this habeas case, the limited issue before the Court was one of those arcane "exhaustion" rules designed to sift out frivolous appeals by prisoners - namely whether the petitioner …
Article • August 25, 2003
Schlup v. Delo, No. 93-7901 (U.S. Supreme Court) (513 U.S. 298; 115 S.Ct. 851) (January 23, 1995) (Justice Stevens) by In this case, the Court established a narrow gateway for overriding a petitioner's clear failure to meet deadlines and requirements for filing a timely petition in federal court - essentially …
Article • August 4, 2003
U.S. v. Chavez, No. 72-1319 (U.S. Supreme Court) (416 U.S. 562; 94 S.Ct. 1849) (May 13, 1974) (Justice White) by Here and in the companion case, U.S. v. Giordano, the Court addressed the validity of wiretap evidence where the Government failed to satisfy fully some of the statutory requirements of …
Article • July 1, 2003 • from P&J July, 2003
Nickerson v. Roe, No. C 98-04909 MHP (N.D.Cal.) (260 F.Supp.2d 875) (March 17, 2003) (Judge Marilyn H. Patel) by This lengthy decision is noted principally for Judge Patel's review and analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 (1995) and her granting of a habeas …
Article • June 2, 2003
Murray v. Carrier, No. 84-1554 (U.S. Supreme Court) (477 U.S. 478; 106 S.Ct. 2639) (June 26, 1986) (Justice O'Connor) by The Court granted certiorari in this case to consider "whether a federal habeas petitioner can show cause for a procedural default by establishing that competent defense counsel inadvertently failed to …
Article • May 13, 2003
Bousley v. U.S., No. 96-8516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (523 U.S. 614; 118 S.Ct. 1604) (May 18, 1998) (Justice Rehnquist) by Here the Court held that a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted a Bailey-type claim by failing to raise it on direct appeal can raise it on collateral review by showing …
Article • May 1, 2003 • from P&J May, 2003
Haley v. Cockrell, No. 01-41389 (5th Cir.) (325 F.3d 569) (March 19, 2003) (Per Curiam) by See subsequent reversal by the Supreme Court at Dretke v. Haley, No. 02-1824 (May 3, 2004).
Article • March 1, 2003 • from P&J March, 2003
Massaro v. U.S., No. 01-1559 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 500; 123 S.Ct. 1690) (April 23, 2003) (Justice Kennedy) by Here the Court unanimously held that an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim may be brought in a collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, whether or not the petitioner had first raised that …
Article • October 1, 2002 • from P&J October, 2002
Haley v. Cockrell, No. 01-41389 (5th Cir.) (306 F.3d 257) (September 27, 2002) (Judge Carl E. Stewart) by Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, asserting that his conviction was illegal. The District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted the petition and ordered …
Article • April 1, 2002 • from P&J April, 2002
Reese v. Baldwin, No. 01-35153 (9th Cir.) (282 F.3d 1184) (March 12, 2002) (Judge Ronald M. Gould) by Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging his conviction for kidnapping and attempted sodomy. The United States District Court for the District of Oregon dismissed the petition, finding …
Page 1 of 2. | 1 2 | Next »