Skip navigation

Search

15 results
Article • September 5, 2016 • from P&J September, 2016
Does v. Snyder, No. 15-1536 (6th Cir.) (834 F.3d 696) (August 25, 2017) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder) by The opening paragraph of Judge Batchelder’s decision in this case fully explains the issue before the Court: “Like many states, Michigan has amended its Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) on a number …
Article • May 28, 2012 • from P&J May, 2012
Prude v. Clarke, No. 11-2811 (7th Cir.) (675 F.3d 732) (March 27, 2012) (Judge Richard A. Posner) by This case is noted for its enlightened discussion of a barbaric practice that is apparently commonplace in a lot of state prisons and local jails - namely feeding “nutraloaf” (also spelled “nutriloaf”) …
Article • December 19, 2005
Libretti v. U.S., No. 94-7427 (U.S. Supreme Court) (516 U.S. 29; 116 S.Ct. 356) (November 7, 1995) (Justice O'Connor) by The defendant in this case was charged with numerous counts including a criminal forfeiture count pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853. He entered a plea agreement and plead guilty to …
Article • July 1, 2004 • from P&J July, 2004
U.S. v. Gementera, No. 03-10103 (9th Cir.) (379 F.3d 596) (August 9, 2004) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain) by Here a divided panel upheld a special condition of supervised release that imposed a humiliating punishment on a convicted felon - namely that he wear a sandwich board announcing that he stole …
Article • June 7, 2003
Hudson v. U.S., No. 96-976 (U.S. Supreme Court) (522 U.S. 93; 118 S.Ct. 488) (December 10, 1997) (Justice Rehnquist) by Case held that if a penalty is applied under a civil statutory scheme, only the "clearest proof" will transform a civil penalty into a criminal punishment for double jeopardy purposes, …
Article • March 12, 2003
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, No. 2 (U.S. Supreme Court) (372 U.S. 144; 83 S.Ct. 554) (February 18, 2063) (Justice Goldberg) by In these two consolidated cases, the United States appealed from orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the Southern District of California (in decisions …
Article • March 17, 2002
Missouri v. Hunter, No. 81-1214 (U.S. Supreme Court) (459 U.S. 359; 103 S.Ct. 673) (January 19, 1983) (Justice Burger) by Here the Court amplified its "Blockburger rule" and held that where Congress "specifically authoriz[es]" cumulative punishments for even the same offense, the Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated. In Blockburger …
Article • September 9, 1999
United Mine Workers v. Bagwell, No. 92-1625 (U.S. Supreme Court) (512 U.S. 821; 114 S.Ct. 2552) (June 30, 1994) (Justice Blackmun) by The Court held that "Underlying the somewhat elusive distinction between civil and criminal contempt fines, and the ultimate question posed in this case, is what procedural protections are …
Article • August 1, 1999 • from P&J August, 1999
U.S. v. Lippitt, No. 98-2385 (7th Cir.) (180 F.3d 873) (June 16, 1999) (Judge Joel L. Flaum) by In the words of the Court, this case "is a challenge to the district court's decision to add forty-seven months to Kenneth Lippitt's prison term for failing to pay a criminal fine …
Article • January 1, 1999 • from P&J January, 1999
U.S. v. Edwards, No. 98-1055 (3rd Cir.) (162 F.3d 87) (November 27, 1998) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell) by Case held that the application of the MVRA to the defendant violated the ex post facto prohibitions of the Constitution since it was not enacted until after the defendant's crimes were committed …
Article • October 1, 1998 • from P&J October, 1998
Johnson v. U.S., No. 97-1151 (6th Cir.) (154 F.3d 569) (August 26, 1998) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt) by This is another case that deals with the Circuit split that has developed about whether a district court may reduce a defendant's term of supervised release to reflect time served in prison …
Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998
U.S. v. Gilchrist, No. 97-7224 (3rd Cir.) (130 F.3d 1131) (December 2, 1997) (Judge William M. Hoeveler) by Here the Court acknowledged that "Supervised release is punishment; it is the deprivation of some small portion of one's liberty imposed as a punitive measure for a bad act." (Id., at 1134).
Article • June 1, 1996 • from P&J June, 1996
U.S. v. Various Computers and Computer Equipment, No. 95-3195 (3rd Cir.) (82 F.3d 582) (April 30, 1996) (Judge Max Rosenn) by The Court also held that "we hold that forfeiture of proceeds under § 981(a)(1)(C) is not punishment. In reaching this outcome, we remain aware of contrary authority. Lundis urges …
Article • May 1, 1996 • from P&J May, 1996
Artway v. Attorney General of State of N.J., No. 95-5195 (3rd Cir.) (81 F.3d 1235) (April 12, 1996) (Judge Edward R. Becker) by QUOTE OF THE WEEK - While Punch and Jurists frequently pokes fun at the tendency of the courts to quibble over hair-splitting profundities that produce the pedantic …
Article • April 1, 1996 • from P&J April, 1996
DiCola v. Food and Drug Admin., No. 94-1689 (D.C. Cir.) (77 F.3d 504) (March 1, 1996) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg) by This case involves the power of the Food and Drug Administration to permanently debar anyone convicted of a felony related to the Federal regulation of drug products from thereafter "providing …