Search | Punch and Jurists

Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy)

Article • March 27, 2019

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy) by Prisoners have limited rights to attend depositions in civil actions. In this case the Court held: "Lawful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, …

Kentucky v. Stincer, No. 86-572 (U.S. Supreme Court) (482 U.S. 730; 107 S.Ct. 2658) (June 19, 1987) (Justice Blackmun)

Article • July 24, 2003

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

Kentucky v. Stincer, No. 86-572 (U.S. Supreme Court) (482 U.S. 730; 107 S.Ct. 2658) (June 19, 1987) (Justice Blackmun) by The defendant in this case was convicted of first-degree sodomy for engaging in deviate sexual intercourse in violation of Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 510.070. During the trial, an in-chambers …

In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)

Article • April 1, 1998 • from P&J April, 1998

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris) by The governing rationale for this decision was probably given away in the very beginning when the majority observed: "Plaintiff is no stranger to the litigation process. In the past four years alone, …

In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)

Article • April 1, 1998 • from P&J April, 1998

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris) by The governing rationale for this decision was probably given away in the very beginning when the majority observed: "Plaintiff is no stranger to the litigation process. In the past four years alone, …

U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Article • January 1, 1998 • from P&J January, 1998

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

U.S. v. Boyd, No. 94-8074 (11th Cir.) (131 F.3d 951) (December 18, 1997) (Per Curiam) by Citing cases, the Court held that Confrontation Clause does not require presence of defendant at hearing on Motion for New Trial.

U.S. v. Canady, No. 96-2402, No. 2003 (2nd Cir.) (126 F.3d 352) (September 24, 1997) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)

Article • November 1, 1997 • from P&J November, 1997

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

U.S. v. Canady, No. 96-2402, No. 2003 (2nd Cir.) (126 F.3d 352) (September 24, 1997) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker) by Defendant has a right to be present when verdict is imposed even following jury trial. The defendant in this case waived his right to a jury trial and, accordingly, …

U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

Article • January 1, 1997 • from P&J January, 1997

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner) by Here the Court held that the defendant did not have the right to be present when he was resentenced on remand.

U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

Article • January 1, 1997 • from P&J January, 1997

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner) by Here the Court held that the defendant did not have the right to be present when he was resentenced on remand.

U.S. v. Pressley, No. 94-3759 (7th Cir.) (100 F.3d 57) (November 8, 1996) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood)

Article • December 1, 1996 • from P&J December, 1996

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

U.S. v. Pressley, No. 94-3759 (7th Cir.) (100 F.3d 57) (November 8, 1996) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood) by

In Re Collins, No. 95-3861 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 614) (November 1, 1995) (Per Curiam)

Article • February 1, 1996 • from P&J February, 1996

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

In Re Collins, No. 95-3861 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 614) (November 1, 1995) (Per Curiam) by On a petition for a Writ of Mandamus, the Court held that the prisoner/petitioner had no right to attend the depositions of the defendants he was suing in a civil rights action.

U.S. v. Mosquera, No. CR 92-1228(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (816 F.Supp. 168) (March 16, 1993) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

Article • January 1, 1994

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present

U.S. v. Mosquera, No. CR 92-1228(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (816 F.Supp. 168) (March 16, 1993) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by Here the Court held that a "meaningfull" presence at trial assumes that the defendant will be informed about the proceedings in a manner that permits him to assist in his own defense …