Search | Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Bertram, No. Crim. No. 3:15-cr-14-GFVT-REW (E.D.Ky.) (259 F.Supp.3d 638) (April 14, 2017) (Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove)

Article • February 12, 2018 • from P&J February, 2018

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Emails

U.S. v. Bertram, No. Crim. No. 3:15-cr-14-GFVT-REW (E.D.Ky.) (259 F.Supp.3d 638) (April 14, 2017) (Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove) by

In Re: Application of U.S. for an Order Directing a Provider of Electronic Communication Service to Disclose Records to the Government, No. 08-4227 (3rd Cir.) (620 F.3d 304) (September 7, 2010) (Judge...

Article • September 20, 2010 • from P&J April, 2008

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Stored Communications Act

In Re: Application of U.S. for an Order Directing a Provider of Electronic Communication Service to Disclose Records to the Government, No. 08-4227 (3rd Cir.) (620 F.3d 304) (September 7, 2010) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter) by Here the Third Circuit became the first Cicruit court to hold that cell phone …

City of Ontario v. Quon, No. 08-1332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (560 U.S. 746; 130 S.Ct. 2619) (June 17, 2010) (Justice Kennedy)

Article • June 28, 2010 • from P&J June, 2010

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Stored Communications Act

City of Ontario v. Quon, No. 08-1332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (560 U.S. 746; 130 S.Ct. 2619) (June 17, 2010) (Justice Kennedy) by Here the Court unanimously held that a California police department did not violate the constitutional privacy rights of a police officer when it audited his sexually explicit text …

U.S. v. Cioffi, No. 08-CR-415 (FB) (E.D.N.Y.) (668 F.Supp.2d 385) (November 2, 2009) (Judge Frederic Block)

Article • April 5, 2010 • from P&J April, 2010

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Emails

U.S. v. Cioffi, No. 08-CR-415 (FB) (E.D.N.Y.) (668 F.Supp.2d 385) (November 2, 2009) (Judge Frederic Block) by Matthew Tannin, one of the defendants in this case, was charged with conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud in connection with two hedge funds he managed for Bear Stearns. In July, 2009, the …

Warshak v. U.S., No. 06-4092 (6th Cir.) (532 F.3d 521) (July 11, 2008) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)

Article • June 1, 2008 • from P&J June, 2008

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Emails

Warshak v. U.S., No. 06-4092 (6th Cir.) (532 F.3d 521) (July 11, 2008) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton) by In Warshak v. U.S., 490 F.3d 455 (6th Cir. June 18, 2007) (“Warshak I”) (P&J, 06/04/07), a panel from the Sixth Circuit issued a landmark decision in which it affirmed an injunction …

In Re U.S. For Order Dir. A Prov. Of Elec. Commun., No. 07-524M (W.D.Pa.) (534 F.Supp.2d 585) (February 19, 2008) (Judge Magistrate)

Article • April 1, 2008 • from P&J April, 2008

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Stored Communications Act

In Re U.S. For Order Dir. A Prov. Of Elec. Commun., No. 07-524M (W.D.Pa.) (534 F.Supp.2d 585) (February 19, 2008) (Judge Magistrate) by Here the judges wrote to express their “concern” about the Government’s growing practice of seeking ex parte orders for access to subscriber records from telecoms based on …

Warshak v. U.S., No. 1:06-cv-357 (S.D.Ohio) (2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50076) (July 21, 2007) (Judge Susan J. Dlott)

Article • December 1, 2007 • from P&J December, 2007

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Emails

Warshak v. U.S., No. 1:06-cv-357 (S.D.Ohio) (2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50076) (July 21, 2007) (Judge Susan J. Dlott) by

Warshak v. U.S., No. 06-4092 (6th Cir.) (490 F.3d 455) (June 18, 2007) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)

Article • June 1, 2007 • from P&J June, 2007

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Emails

Warshak v. U.S., No. 06-4092 (6th Cir.) (490 F.3d 455) (June 18, 2007) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin) by In this case, a panel from the Sixth Circuit examined a common eavesdropping program used by the Government involving the secret interception of a person’s emails that are stored on the …

U.S. v. Siddiqui, No. 98-6994 (11th Cir.) (235 F.3d 1318) (December 15, 2000) (Judge Lloyd D. George)

Article • February 1, 2001 • from P&J February, 2001

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Emails

U.S. v. Siddiqui, No. 98-6994 (11th Cir.) (235 F.3d 1318) (December 15, 2000) (Judge Lloyd D. George) by This case is noted principally as one of the first cases we have seen in which a Circuit court has upheld the use of e-mails as evidence in a criminal case. Here …