Search | Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Wright, No. Crim. No. 2:93cr262-T (M.D.Ala.) (342 F.Supp.2d 1068) (November 2, 2004) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)

Article • December 1, 2004 • from P&J December, 2004

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

U.S. v. Wright, No. Crim. No. 2:93cr262-T (M.D.Ala.) (342 F.Supp.2d 1068) (November 2, 2004) (Judge Myron H. Thompson) by Defendant filed motions to hold her sentence by video conference in connection with her guilty plea to violations of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (unlawful possession of a firearm), 21 U.S.C. § …

U.S. v. Burke, No. 02-5470 (6th Cir.) (345 F.3d 416) (October 1, 2003) (Judge John M. Rogers)

Article • October 1, 2003 • from P&J October, 2003

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

U.S. v. Burke, No. 02-5470 (6th Cir.) (345 F.3d 416) (October 1, 2003) (Judge John M. Rogers) by This case is noted for its up-to-date review of the law on video-conferencing and when it is permitted in Federal criminal cases. The Court noted that most of the cases have traced …

U.S. v. Davis, No. 02-1569 (2nd Cir.) (326 F.3d 361) (April 22, 2003) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)

Article • April 1, 2003 • from P&J April, 2003

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video Cameras

U.S. v. Davis, No. 02-1569 (2nd Cir.) (326 F.3d 361) (April 22, 2003) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann) by The defendant in this case was convicted at trial of distributing five or more grams of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). At trial, the Government offered …

Maryland v. Craig, No. 89-478 (U.S. Supreme Court) (497 U.S. 836; 110 S.Ct. 3157) (June 27, 1990) (Justice O'Connor)

Article • December 7, 2002

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

Maryland v. Craig, No. 89-478 (U.S. Supreme Court) (497 U.S. 836; 110 S.Ct. 3157) (June 27, 1990) (Justice O'Connor) by The issue before the Court in this case was whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment categorically prohibits a child witness in a child abuse case from testifying against …

Lomholt v. Burt, No. C01-2018-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (219 F.Supp.2d 977) (May 2, 2002) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)

Article • November 1, 2002 • from P&J November, 2002

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

Lomholt v. Burt, No. C01-2018-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (219 F.Supp.2d 977) (May 2, 2002) (Judge Mark W. Bennett) by The petitioner in this case, Mark Lomholt, was convicted in 1996 of two counts of second degree sexual abuse, primarily on the testimony of the two victims, a four-year old female and a …

U.S. v. Navarro, No. 97-41162 (5th Cir.) (169 F.3d 228) (March 8, 1999) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)

Article • April 1, 1999 • from P&J April, 1999

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

U.S. v. Navarro, No. 97-41162 (5th Cir.) (169 F.3d 228) (March 8, 1999) (Judge Emilio M. Garza) by In this case, the defendant refused to sign a Waiver of Rights and Consent to Proceed by Video-Conference, and he objected that th wanted to be sentenced in person. The district court …

U.S. v. Gigante, No. 98-1001 (2nd Cir.) (166 F.3d 75) (January 22, 1999) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)

Article • March 1, 1999 • from P&J March, 1999

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

U.S. v. Gigante, No. 98-1001 (2nd Cir.) (166 F.3d 75) (January 22, 1999) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker) by This appeal, which involved the conviction of a high-profile organized crime leader, principally through the testimony of six former members of the Mafia who had become cooperating witnesses, is noted for …

U.S. v. Moses, No. 95-1827 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 894) (February 26, 1998) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)

Article • April 1, 1998 • from P&J April, 1998

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

U.S. v. Moses, No. 95-1827 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 894) (February 26, 1998) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich) by Case reversed conviction because district court failed to follow procedures specified in statute and refused to allow defendant to cross-examine child witness whose testimony was given by closed circuit TV.

U.S. v. Rouse, No. 95-1554 (8th Cir.) (111 F.3d 561) (April 11, 1997) (Judge James B. Loken)

Article • May 1, 1997 • from P&J May, 1997

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony

U.S. v. Rouse, No. 95-1554 (8th Cir.) (111 F.3d 561) (April 11, 1997) (Judge James B. Loken) by Prior to trial, the government filed a motion to permit all child witnesses to testify by closed circuit TV. Although the district court denied that motion on a preliminary basis, at trial …