In Re Collins, No. 95-3861 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 614) (November 1, 1995) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
February 19, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Right to be Present.
On a petition for a Writ of Mandamus, the Court held that the prisoner/petitioner had no right to attend the depositions of the defendants he was suing in a civil rights action.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Riascos-Suarez, No. 95-5035 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 616) (January 12, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- Ables v. Scott, No. 94-10934 (5th Cir.) (73 F.3d 591) (January 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Pratt, No. 95-1666 (1st Cir.) (73 F.3d 450) (January 18, 1996) (Judge Bailey Aldrich)
- In Re Collins, No. 95-3861 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 614) (November 1, 1995) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hoffenberg, No. 94 Cr. 0273 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) (908 F.Supp. 1265) (December 18, 1995) (Judge Robert W. Sweet)
- U.S. v. Riascos-Suarez, No. 95-5035 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 616) (January 12, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- U.S. v. Townsend, No. 95-1985 (7th Cir.) (73 F.3d 747) (January 11, 1996) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- Ables v. Scott, No. 94-10934 (5th Cir.) (73 F.3d 591) (January 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Foley, No. 94-1051, No. 516 (2nd Cir.) (73 F.3d 484) (January 4, 1996) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Riascos-Suarez, No. 95-5035 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 616) (January 12, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Petitioner Has Constitutional Right to Be Present at Evidentiary Hearing Under Felony Murder Resentencing Law, May 15, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Right to be Present.
- California Court of Appeal: Petitioner Has Constitutional Right to Be Present at Hearing to Determine Facts Surrounding Felony Murder Charges for Possible Resentencing Under § 1172.6, March 15, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Right to be Present.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.