U.S. v. Riascos-Suarez, No. 95-5035 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 616) (January 12, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
February 19, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Failure to Address/Advise Defendant.
One of the issues raised by the defendant was that the sentencing court erred when it failed to address him personally prior to imposing sentence as required by Rule 32 (c)( 3)(C) ; and, relying on U.S. v. Axelrod, 48 F.3d 72 (2nd Cir. 1995), he further argued that …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Riascos-Suarez, No. 95-5035 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 616) (January 12, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- U.S. v. Foley, No. 94-1051, No. 516 (2nd Cir.) (73 F.3d 484) (January 4, 1996) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- Ables v. Scott, No. 94-10934 (5th Cir.) (73 F.3d 591) (January 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Townsend, No. 95-1985 (7th Cir.) (73 F.3d 747) (January 11, 1996) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- U.S. v. Riascos-Suarez, No. 95-5035 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 616) (January 12, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- U.S. v. Hoffenberg, No. 94 Cr. 0273 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) (908 F.Supp. 1265) (December 18, 1995) (Judge Robert W. Sweet)
- In Re Collins, No. 95-3861 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 614) (November 1, 1995) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Pratt, No. 95-1666 (1st Cir.) (73 F.3d 450) (January 18, 1996) (Judge Bailey Aldrich)
- Ables v. Scott, No. 94-10934 (5th Cir.) (73 F.3d 591) (January 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Riascos-Suarez, No. 95-5035 (6th Cir.) (73 F.3d 616) (January 12, 1996) (Judge James L. Oakes)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Announces State-Law Exceptions to Appeal Deadlines Preserve “Pending” Status Under AEDPA, Holding Belated-Appeal Procedures Toll Federal Habeas Limitations Period, April 1, 2026. Limitations, Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Appealable Issues/Orders, Failure to Address/Advise Defendant.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds Motion Judge Abused Discretion by Denying Evidentiary Hearing on IAC Claim Where Plea Counsel’s Affidavit Was Not Inherently Inconsistent With Colloquy Statements Regarding Immigration Advice, March 1, 2026. Deportation/Removal/Exclusion, Failure to Address/Advise Defendant, Collateral and Direct Consequences, Consequences of Plea, Grounds For Withdrawal.
- California Court of Appeal Reverses Superior Court’s Denial of Motion to Vacate Conviction Where Defendant Established His Failure to Understand the Immigration Consequences of Plea, Oct. 15, 2025. Mental Health, Failure to Address/Advise Defendant, Aggravated Felony, Asylum, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Vermont Supreme Court Announces Prejudice Determination for IAC Claim Based on Rejected Plea Offer Limited to Evidence Available at Time Plea Considered—Not Any Subsequent Evidence, April 15, 2024. Failure to Address/Advise Defendant, Consequences of Plea.
- Seventh Circuit: Incompetent Advice to Reject Plea Offer Requires Evidentiary Hearing, Nov. 15, 2020. Failure to Address/Advise Defendant.
- Tenth Circuit Vacates Conviction, Rules Waiver of Trial Counsel Not Knowingly Made, Aug. 15, 2020. Failure to Address/Advise Defendant, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.