Hays v. State of Ala., No. 95-6378 (11th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1492) (June 6, 1996) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
Loaded on July 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
July 15, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995), the Court held that a showing of materiality does not require proving that dusclosure of the suppressed evidence would have resulted in the defendant's acquittal.
Here the Court held: "The issue is thus whether it is ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Long, No. 95-2724 (7th Cir.) (86 F.3d 81) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cefalu, No. 95-1225, No. 787 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 964) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
- U.S. v. August, No. 95-30220 (9th Cir.) (86 F.3d 151) (June 11, 1996) (Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong)
- U.S. v. Isom, No. 94-1372 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 831) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Antonietti, No. 94-2393 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 206) (June 26, 1996) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Patino-Cardenas, No. 94-20914 (5th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1133) (June 10, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. McQueen, No. 94-4701 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 180) (June 20, 1996) (Judge Paul H. Roney)
- U.S. v. Lindemann, No. 96-1188 (7th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1232) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Samuel Ray Cummings)
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- Baker v. Pataki, No. 94-2163, No. 565 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 919) (May 30, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ventura, No. 95-1871 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 708) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Guzman, No. 95-1234 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 823) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- Hogan v. Carter, No. 94-7037 (4th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1113) (June 4, 1996) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- Hays v. State of Ala., No. 95-6378 (11th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1492) (June 6, 1996) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Sawyer, No. 95-1689 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 713) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
- U.S. v. Versaglio, No. 95-1238, No. 509 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 943) (June 3, 1996) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- U.S. v. Ventura, No. 95-1871 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 708) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Affirms Granting of New Trial in Murder Case Based on IAC Where Counsel Failed to Investigate Exculpatory Evidence Contained in a Proffer and Provided to Counsel Prior to Trial, May 15, 2023. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
- California Supreme Court Announces Government’s Continuing Brady Obligations and Ethical Duty of Disclosure During Habeas Proceedings Regarding Alleged Exculpatory Evidence Available at Time of Trial but Suppressed, April 15, 2023. Habeas Corpus, Suppression, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
- Iowa Supreme Court Announces Brady Standard Applies to Motion for New Trial Based on Withheld Exculpatory Medical Records, April 15, 2021. Medical Records, Brady Rule violations, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
- Third Circuit: Brady Claims in Habeas Petitions Timely When Filed Within One Year of Date Reason to Believe Prosecutor Violated Duty To Disclose, March 15, 2021. Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Timeliness of Motion, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.