U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on July 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
July 15, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Factors To Be Considered.
Here the Court held that, while there are no limitations on what factors a court may consider in deciding not to grant a Rule 35(b) sentence reduction, the only factor it may consider in granting such a motion is the defendant's substantial assistance.
In this case, the Court …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ventura, No. 95-1871 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 708) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Versaglio, No. 95-1238, No. 509 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 943) (June 3, 1996) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- U.S. v. Sawyer, No. 95-1689 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 713) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
- Hays v. State of Ala., No. 95-6378 (11th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1492) (June 6, 1996) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- Hogan v. Carter, No. 94-7037 (4th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1113) (June 4, 1996) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- U.S. v. Guzman, No. 95-1234 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 823) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Ventura, No. 95-1871 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 708) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- Baker v. Pataki, No. 94-2163, No. 565 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 919) (May 30, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Lindemann, No. 96-1188 (7th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1232) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Samuel Ray Cummings)
- U.S. v. McQueen, No. 94-4701 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 180) (June 20, 1996) (Judge Paul H. Roney)
- U.S. v. Patino-Cardenas, No. 94-20914 (5th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1133) (June 10, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Antonietti, No. 94-2393 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 206) (June 26, 1996) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Isom, No. 94-1372 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 831) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. August, No. 95-30220 (9th Cir.) (86 F.3d 151) (June 11, 1996) (Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong)
- U.S. v. Cefalu, No. 95-1225, No. 787 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 964) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Long, No. 95-2724 (7th Cir.) (86 F.3d 81) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
More from these topics:
- Second Circuit Clarifies Limits on Sentencing Court’s Use of Unrelated Co-Defendant Conduct as § 3553(a) “Context”, June 1, 2026. Statement of Reasons, Plain Error, Factors To Be Considered, Acquitted Conduct/Uncharged Crimes/Dismissed Counts, Relevant Conduct.
- Sixth Circuit Announces Predetermining a Supervisee’s Revocation Term of Imprisonment at an Earlier Violation Hearing Renders the Resulting Sentence Both Procedurally and Substantively Unreasonable, June 1, 2026. Revocation Proceedings, Plain Error, Reasonableness of Sentence, Factors To Be Considered.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.