U.S. v. Antonietti, No. 94-2393 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 206) (June 26, 1996) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
Loaded on July 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
July 15, 1996
Rejecting the Ninth Circuit's view in U.S. v. Kipp, 10 F.3d 1463, the 11th Circuit holds that drugs held for personal consumption are properly included as relevant conduct in determining the defendant's base offense level.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ventura, No. 95-1871 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 708) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- U.S. v. Versaglio, No. 95-1238, No. 509 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 943) (June 3, 1996) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- U.S. v. Sawyer, No. 95-1689 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 713) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
- Hays v. State of Ala., No. 95-6378 (11th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1492) (June 6, 1996) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- Hogan v. Carter, No. 94-7037 (4th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1113) (June 4, 1996) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- U.S. v. Guzman, No. 95-1234 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 823) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Ventura, No. 95-1871 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 708) (May 30, 1996) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)
- Baker v. Pataki, No. 94-2163, No. 565 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 919) (May 30, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Lindemann, No. 96-1188 (7th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1232) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Samuel Ray Cummings)
- U.S. v. McQueen, No. 94-4701 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 180) (June 20, 1996) (Judge Paul H. Roney)
- U.S. v. Patino-Cardenas, No. 94-20914 (5th Cir.) (85 F.3d 1133) (June 10, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Antonietti, No. 94-2393 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 206) (June 26, 1996) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Isom, No. 94-1372 (1st Cir.) (85 F.3d 831) (June 7, 1996) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. August, No. 95-30220 (9th Cir.) (86 F.3d 151) (June 11, 1996) (Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong)
- U.S. v. Cefalu, No. 95-1225, No. 787 (2nd Cir.) (85 F.3d 964) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
- U.S. v. Manella, No. 94-3546 (11th Cir.) (86 F.3d 201) (June 25, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Long, No. 95-2724 (7th Cir.) (86 F.3d 81) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
More from these topics:
- Tenth Circuit, Joining Sister Circuits, Announces ‘Personal-Use’ Drug Quantity Doesn’t Constitute ‘Relevant Conduct’ Under Guidelines § 1B1.3(a) and Sets Forth Framework for Burden of Proof Analysis, Feb. 15, 2022. Drug Quantity, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Relevant Conduct.
- Mississippi Supreme Court: Drug Buy Between Dealer and User Doesn’t Constitute Conspiracy to Distribute, Aug. 15, 2021. Conspiracy, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Washington Supreme Court Announces State’s Strict-Liability Drug Possession Law Is Unconstitutional, May 15, 2021. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Denial of Due Process.
- Fifth Circuit: Evidence of Simple Drug Possession Insufficient to Search Cellphone Photos for Evidence of Drug Trafficking, March 15, 2021. Cell-Phone Location/Tracking Data, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Tenth Circuit: Confession Involuntary Where FBI Agent Falsely Claimed to Be in Contact With Judge, and Defendant Could Shorten Sentence With Each Truthful Answer, Aug. 15, 2020. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Interrogation, Cooperation.
- Using Doctor-Prescribed Marijuana Could Send Some People Back to Prison, July 15, 2020. Revocation Proceedings, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Complexity and Lack of Standardization Makes Crime Statistics Less Useful, April 15, 2020. Statistics/Trends, Marijuana Laws/Issues, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.