Skip navigation

U.S. v. Long, No. 95-2724 (7th Cir.) (86 F.3d 81) (June 4, 1996) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)

After the defendant was convicted of drug trafficking, he appealed arguing that the trial court had improperly (and over his Rule 404(b) objections) allowed the introduction of testimony from a witness about the defendant’s previous involvement in an unrelated crack transaction. Specifically he argued that in light of the dissimilarity ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login