U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
Loaded on May 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
May 20, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Ability to Pay.
Court vacated restitution order due to failure to make required findings.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Wang v. Reno, No. 93-17262 (9th Cir.) (81 F.3d 808) (April 12, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Lang, No. 95-3260 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 955) (April 12, 1996) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 95-8053 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 945) (April 11, 1996) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Tedder, No. 95-10325 (5th Cir.) (81 F.3d 549) (April 15, 1996) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 95-8053 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 945) (April 11, 1996) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Forte, No. 95-3076 (D.C. Cir.) (81 F.3d 215) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Lang, No. 95-3260 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 955) (April 12, 1996) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Reed, No. 95-10118 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 1419) (April 11, 1996) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- Faulder v. Johnson, No. 95-40512 (5th Cir.) (81 F.3d 515) (April 10, 1996) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 94-3123 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 915) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Deanell R. Tacha)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Medina-Estrada, No. 95-4150 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 981) (April 16, 1996) (Judge James E. Barrett)
More from these topics:
- South Dakota Sobriety Program Participants Will No Longer Be Jailed for Non-Payment of Fees, March 1, 2026. Settlements, Class Certification, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Unlawful Detention, Ability to Pay.
- California Supreme Court Announces Excessive Fines Clauses Are the Proper Method to Challenge Punitive Fines, Holds Equal Protection Requires Courts to Consider Defendant’s Inability to Pay Before Imposing Certain Ancillary Assessments Upon Request, Feb. 1, 2026. Constitution, U.S., Constitution, state, Equal Protection Clause/Claims, Fines, Ability to Pay.
- Report on “Pay-to-Stay” Fees Makes Strong Case for Their Repeal, Jan. 1, 2026. Racial Discrimination, Medical Expenses, Cost of Prison Systems, housing, Ability to Pay.
- Kentucky Supreme Court Voids Prisoner’s $10,972 Jail Fee, July 15, 2025. Booking Fees, Supervision Fee, Ability to Pay.
- Florida’s “Pay to Stay” Law: A Second Sentence for Former Prisoners, May 1, 2025. Ability to Pay.
- Medical Copays Blamed for Reducing Prisoner Access to Healthcare, May 1, 2025. Medical Misconduct, Medical Expenses, Ability to Pay.
- Missouri Repeals “Pay-to-Stay” Law, May 1, 2025. Cost of Prison Systems, Costs, Ability to Pay.
- Fines and Fees Destroy the Impoverished and Perpetuate Mass Incarceration, Jan. 15, 2025. Effects of Mass Incarceration, Ability to Pay.
- $3.25 Million Settlement Reached With Defendants Jailed in Missouri “Debtor’s Prison” for Unpaid Fines, Fees, Oct. 15, 2023. Settlements, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Ability to Pay, Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP).
- Corizon Executes “Texas Two-Step,” Spinning Off Debt Into Bankrupt New Firm to Avoid Paying Creditors and Lawsuit Winners, Aug. 15, 2023. Corizon, Settlements, Ability to Pay.