Skip navigation

U.S. v. Burke, No. 95-2675 (8th Cir.) (80 F.3d 314) (April 8, 1996) (Judge James B. Loken)

This is a rare case in which a sentence is vacated because the district court failed to make an appropriate finding required by Rule 32(b) with respect to facts contained in the PSI Report that the defendant contested. The prosecutor failed to present any evidence in support of the disputed ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login